The 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) requires a computer program for scoring. The primary purpose of this study was to pilot test the scoring software and examine the perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66 as judged by 48 pediatric physical therapists. Sixty-one percent of therapists were confident in their ability to interpret the information from the computer program following one hour spent reading the tutorial and interpretation guidelines. Ninety-three percent of respondents perceived the overall clinical utility of the GMFM-66 in terms of administration, scoring and interpretation to be the same or more clinically useful than the GMFM-88.
%0 Journal Article
%1 OTDbase39490
%A Russell, D. J.
%A Leung, K. M.
%A Rosenbaum, P. L.
%D 2003
%J POTP
%K access computer lit-review disability
%N 2
%P 45--58
%T Accessibility and Perceived Clinical Utility of the GMFM-66: Evaluating Therapists' Judgements of a Computer-Based Scoring Program
%U http://thebishops.org/otdbase/FMPro?-db=otdbase%5fdatabase.fp3&-format=detail.htm&-lay=list&-max=20&-recid=39490&-find=
%V 23
%X The 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) requires a computer program for scoring. The primary purpose of this study was to pilot test the scoring software and examine the perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66 as judged by 48 pediatric physical therapists. Sixty-one percent of therapists were confident in their ability to interpret the information from the computer program following one hour spent reading the tutorial and interpretation guidelines. Ninety-three percent of respondents perceived the overall clinical utility of the GMFM-66 in terms of administration, scoring and interpretation to be the same or more clinically useful than the GMFM-88.
@article{OTDbase39490,
abstract = {The 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) requires a computer program for scoring. The primary purpose of this study was to pilot test the scoring software and examine the perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66 as judged by 48 pediatric physical therapists. Sixty-one percent of therapists were confident in their ability to interpret the information from the computer program following one hour spent reading the tutorial and interpretation guidelines. Ninety-three percent of respondents perceived the overall clinical utility of the GMFM-66 in terms of administration, scoring and interpretation to be the same or more clinically useful than the GMFM-88.},
added-at = {2007-02-16T15:24:54.000+0100},
author = {Russell, D. J. and Leung, K. M. and Rosenbaum, P. L.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/207a4bb4e3f8e087d465ba617bd246a65/willwade},
citeulike-article-id = {274083},
interhash = {34eefcd122eeae55ff5a1fba51005600},
intrahash = {07a4bb4e3f8e087d465ba617bd246a65},
journal = {POTP},
keywords = {access computer lit-review disability},
number = 2,
pages = {45--58},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2007-02-16T15:24:58.000+0100},
title = {Accessibility and Perceived Clinical Utility of the GMFM-66: Evaluating Therapists' Judgements of a Computer-Based Scoring Program},
url = {http://thebishops.org/otdbase/FMPro?-db=otdbase%5fdatabase.fp3\&-format=detail.htm\&-lay=list\&-max=20\&-recid=39490\&-find=},
volume = 23,
year = 2003
}