%0 Conference Paper %1 Winjum05 %A Winjum, E. %A Hegland, A.M. %A Spilling, P. %A Kure, O. %B Military Communications Conference, 2005. MILCOM 2005. IEEE %D 2005 %K bandwidth_allocation bandwidth_consumption delay digital_signatures mobile_wireless_ad_hoc_network optimized_link_state_routing performance_evaluation resource_allocation resource_consumption routing_message security_scheme signature_message protocol ad-hoc network mobile radio security telecommunication OLSR proactive %P 2307 -2313 Vol. 4 %R 10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1606013 %T A performance evaluation of security schemes proposed for the OLSR protocol %X The proactive optimized link state routing (OLSR) protocol for mobile wireless ad hoc networks has no default security services. Three different schemes have been proposed to protect the protocol. Even though equal with regard to provided security services, the impact on resource consumption diverge significantly due to the design choices. This paper investigates and analyzes the recommended mechanisms with regard to bandwidth consumption and delay. Mechanisms evaluated are the utilization of separate signature messages versus directly signed routing messages, routing message aggregation as a possible way of reducing bandwidth consumption, times tamps versus sequence numbers as the basis for replay protection and periodical versus on-demand exchange of time information

@inproceedings{Winjum05, abstract = {The proactive optimized link state routing (OLSR) protocol for mobile wireless ad hoc networks has no default security services. Three different schemes have been proposed to protect the protocol. Even though equal with regard to provided security services, the impact on resource consumption diverge significantly due to the design choices. This paper investigates and analyzes the recommended mechanisms with regard to bandwidth consumption and delay. Mechanisms evaluated are the utilization of separate signature messages versus directly signed routing messages, routing message aggregation as a possible way of reducing bandwidth consumption, times tamps versus sequence numbers as the basis for replay protection and periodical versus on-demand exchange of time information}, added-at = {2011-07-15T15:18:02.000+0200}, author = {Winjum, E. and Hegland, A.M. and Spilling, P. and Kure, O.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/215c4100afd738333b7995d8cb2e8ed8a/msteele}, booktitle = {Military Communications Conference, 2005. MILCOM 2005. IEEE}, doi = {10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1606013}, interhash = {596b7dcd556b8ae60f1295f79e741b94}, intrahash = {15c4100afd738333b7995d8cb2e8ed8a}, keywords = {bandwidth_allocation bandwidth_consumption delay digital_signatures mobile_wireless_ad_hoc_network optimized_link_state_routing performance_evaluation resource_allocation resource_consumption routing_message security_scheme signature_message protocol ad-hoc network mobile radio security telecommunication OLSR proactive}, month = oct, owner = {msteele}, pages = {2307 -2313 Vol. 4}, review = {Discusses overhead introduced by securing the OLSR protocol. The interesting read of this paper should be the proposals on secuing OLSR.}, timestamp = {2011-07-15T20:00:07.000+0200}, title = {{A performance evaluation of security schemes proposed for the OLSR protocol}}, year = 2005 }