@article{wiley2008,
        title = {An Operational Landscape Unit approach for identifying key landscape connections in wetland restoration},
        address = {Landscape Ecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.84, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands; and ;  Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands},
        author = {Jos T.A. Verhoeven and Merel B. Soons and Ron Janssen and Nancy Omtzigt},
        journal = {Journal of Applied Ecology},
        number = 5,
        pages = {1496-1503},
        publisher = {© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society},
        volume = 45,
        year = 2008,
        url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01534.x},
        doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01534.x},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/294174de769d441b8200015136eb40557/birgitaue},
	keywords = {wetland connectivity, landscape, hydrology,}
}

@article{keyhere,
        title = {Impact of agricultural subsidies on biodiversity at the landscape level},
        author = {Thomas Gottschalk and Tim Diekötter and Klemens Ekschmitt and Bernd Weinmann and Friedrich Kuhlmann and Tobias Purtauf and Jens Dauber and Volkmar Wolters},
        journal = {Landscape Ecology},
        month = {#may#},
        number = 5,
        pages = {643--656},
        volume = 22,
        year = 2007,
        url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9060-8},
        description = {SpringerLink - Zeitschriftenbeitrag},
	abstract = {Abstract  Agricultural management is a major factor driving the change of faunal richness in anthropogenic landscapes. Thus, there is
an urgent need to develop tools that allow decision-makers to understand better intended and unintended effects of agriculturalpolicy measures on biodiversity. Here we demonstrate the potential of such a tool by combining a socio-economic model withthe biodiversity model GEPARD to forecast the response of bird and carabid species richness to two scenarios of agriculturalsubsidies: (1) subsidies based on production levels and prices and (2) direct income support that is independent of productionlevels. We focussed on farmland of the Lahn-Dill area, Germany, as an example of European regions with low intensity farming.GEPARD predicts faunal richness and is based on multi-scaled resource-selection functions. Under both scenarios the area ofpredicted losses in species richness of birds and carabids was larger than the area of predicted gains in species richness.However, the area with predicted losses of avian richness was smaller under the direct income support scenario than underthe production-based subsidy scenario, whereas the area with predicted losses of carabid species richness was smaller underthe production-based subsidy scenario than under the direct income support. Yet locally, richness gains of up to four specieswere predicted for carabids under both scenarios. We conclude that the sometimes contrasting and heterogeneous responses ofbirds and carabids at different localities suggest the need for spatially targeted subsidy schemes. With the help of the GIS-basedapproach presented in this study, prediction maps on potential changes in local and regional species richness can be easilygenerated.},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/214c8b9188fde61afe8b192b2574ab3ff/birgitaue},
	keywords = {biodiverty modelling landscape}
}

@article{wiley2008,
        title = {A working guide to boosted regression trees},
        address = {School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3010; ;  National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11115, Hamilton, New Zealand; and ;  Department of Statistics, Stanford University, CA, USA},
        author = {J. Elith and J. R. Leathwick and T. Hastie},
        journal = {Journal of Animal Ecology},
        number = 4,
        pages = {802-813},
        publisher = {© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society},
        volume = 77,
        year = 2008,
        url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x},
        doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x},
	description = {Wiley InterScience :: JOURNALS :: Journal of Animal Ecology},
	abstract = {Überblick über Funktionsweise von BRT},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c6dfc441b1e31808952a75e042b85c47/birgitaue},
	keywords = {statistic tree" "regression}
}

@article{keyhere,
        title = {Data Integration and Workflow Solutions for Ecology},
        author = {William Michener and James Beach and Shawn Bowers and Laura Downey and Matthew Jones and Bertram Ludäscher and Deana Pennington and Arcot Rajasekar and Samantha Romanello and Mark Schildhauer and Dave Vieglais and Jianting Zhang},
        journal = {Data Integration in the Life Sciences},
        pages = {321--324},
        year = 2005,
        url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11530084_32},
        abstract = {The Science Environment for Ecological Knowledgeseek.ecoinformatics.org (SEEK) is designed to help ecologists overcome data integration and synthesis challenges. The SEEK environment enables ecologists to efficiently capture, organize, and search for data and analytical processes. We describe SEEK and discuss how it can benefit ecological niche modeling in which biodiversity scientists require access and integration of regional and global data as well as significant analytical resources.
ER  -},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c9cab9f21839e6905b964c4fde934f16/birgitaue},
	keywords = {imported}
}