Performed multidimensional scaling on scholars' judgments about the similarities of the subject-matter of different academic areas. 168 university scholars made judgments about 36 areas, and 54 small-college scholars judged similarities among 30 areas. G. A. Miller's method of sorting was used in collecting data. 3 dimensions were common to the solutions of both samples: existence of a paradigm, concern with application, and concern with life systems. It appears that these dimensions are general to the subject-matter of most academic institutions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
%0 Generic
%1 biglan1973characteristics
%A Biglan, Anthony
%C US
%D 1973
%I American Psychological Association
%J Journal of Applied Psychology
%K disciplines social_sciences subject_differences subject_matter subjects
%N 3
%P 195--203
%R 10.1037/h0034701
%T The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas
%V 57
%X Performed multidimensional scaling on scholars' judgments about the similarities of the subject-matter of different academic areas. 168 university scholars made judgments about 36 areas, and 54 small-college scholars judged similarities among 30 areas. G. A. Miller's method of sorting was used in collecting data. 3 dimensions were common to the solutions of both samples: existence of a paradigm, concern with application, and concern with life systems. It appears that these dimensions are general to the subject-matter of most academic institutions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
@misc{biglan1973characteristics,
abstract = {Performed multidimensional scaling on scholars' judgments about the similarities of the subject-matter of different academic areas. 168 university scholars made judgments about 36 areas, and 54 small-college scholars judged similarities among 30 areas. G. A. Miller's method of sorting was used in collecting data. 3 dimensions were common to the solutions of both samples: existence of a paradigm, concern with application, and concern with life systems. It appears that these dimensions are general to the subject-matter of most academic institutions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)},
added-at = {2016-01-02T12:27:07.000+0100},
address = {US},
author = {Biglan, Anthony},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2511e44c4372e932f67a3e9dcbab5eb10/hangdong},
doi = {10.1037/h0034701},
interhash = {41e5ab0039cb9b2cce77826490690c12},
intrahash = {511e44c4372e932f67a3e9dcbab5eb10},
issn = {19391854},
journal = {Journal of Applied Psychology},
keywords = {disciplines social_sciences subject_differences subject_matter subjects},
number = 3,
pages = {195--203},
publisher = {American Psychological Association},
refid = {1974-01819-001},
timestamp = {2016-01-02T12:27:07.000+0100},
title = {The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas},
volume = 57,
year = 1973
}