Effectiveness of a 1-year resident training program in clinical research: a controlled before-and-after study.
Journal of general internal medicine, 23 (2):
122-8 (February 2008)5032<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20090224; JID: 8605834; CIN: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):219-20. PMID: 18183469; OID: NLM: PMC2359160; 2007/03/06 received; 2007/09/13 accepted; 2007/08/28 revised; 2007/10/06 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Recursos/Organització; Formació.DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0397-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To increase the number of clinician scientists and to improve research skills, a number of clinical research training programs have been recently established. However, controlled studies assessing their effectiveness are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a 1-year resident training program in clinical research. DESIGN: Controlled before-and-after study. The training program included a weekly class in clinical research methods, completion of a research project, and mentorship. PARTICIPANTS: Intervention subjects were 15 residents participating in the 1-year training program in clinical research. Control subjects were 22 residents not participating in the training program. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Assessments were performed at the beginning and end of the program. Outcomes included methodological research knowledge (multiple-choice progress test), self-assessed research competence, progress on publications and grant applications, and evaluation of the program using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: Intervention subjects and controls were well matched with respect to research experience (5.1 +/- 2.2 vs 5.6 +/- 5.8 years; p = .69). Methodological knowledge improved significantly more in the intervention group compared to the control group (effect size = 2.5; p < .001). Similarly, self-assessed research competence increased significantly more in the intervention group (effect size = 1.1; p = .01). At the end of the program, significantly more intervention subjects compared to controls were currently writing journal articles (87% vs 36%; p = .003). The intervention subjects evaluated the training program as highly valuable for becoming independent researchers. CONCLUSIONS: A 1-year training program in clinical research can substantially increase research knowledge and productivity. The program design makes it feasible to implement in other academic settings.