Agency, the Duality of Structure and the Problem of the Archaeological Record
J. Barrett. Archaeological theory today, Polity, Cambridge, UK, (2001)
Abstract
This volume provides an authoritative account of the current status of archaeological theory, as presented by some of its major exponents and innovators over the last decade. It summarizes recent developments and looks to the future, exploring some of the cutting-edge ideas at the forefront of the discipline.
While few practitioners in theoretical archaeology would still argue for a unified disciplinary approach, few volumes have explored the full range of emerging perspectives. This volume, however, captures the diversity of contemporary archaeological theory. Some authors argue for an approach close to the natural sciences, others for an engagement with cultural debate about representation of the past. Some minimize the relevance of culture to societal change, while others see it as central; some focus on the contingent and the local, others on long-term evolution.
The volume also reflects archaeology's new openness to external influences, as well as the desire to contribute to wider debates. The contributors examine ways in which archaeological evidence contributes to theories of evolutionary psychology, as well as to the social sciences in general, where theories of social relationships, agency, landscape and identity are informed by the long-term perspective of archaeology.
- individual learning or decision making that is the hallmark of the agent-based model: '*the social totality should not form the basic domain or unit of archaeological study* ... as individuals learn so they make society emphasis in original'' (155)
%0 Book Section
%1 Barrett:2001
%A Barrett, John
%B Archaeological theory today
%C Cambridge, UK
%D 2001
%E Hodder, Ian
%I Polity
%K agency agent-based archaeology complexity modeling theory
%P 141--164
%T Agency, the Duality of Structure and the Problem of the Archaeological Record
%X This volume provides an authoritative account of the current status of archaeological theory, as presented by some of its major exponents and innovators over the last decade. It summarizes recent developments and looks to the future, exploring some of the cutting-edge ideas at the forefront of the discipline.
While few practitioners in theoretical archaeology would still argue for a unified disciplinary approach, few volumes have explored the full range of emerging perspectives. This volume, however, captures the diversity of contemporary archaeological theory. Some authors argue for an approach close to the natural sciences, others for an engagement with cultural debate about representation of the past. Some minimize the relevance of culture to societal change, while others see it as central; some focus on the contingent and the local, others on long-term evolution.
The volume also reflects archaeology's new openness to external influences, as well as the desire to contribute to wider debates. The contributors examine ways in which archaeological evidence contributes to theories of evolutionary psychology, as well as to the social sciences in general, where theories of social relationships, agency, landscape and identity are informed by the long-term perspective of archaeology.
%Z - individual learning or decision making that is the hallmark of the agent-based model: '*the social totality should not form the basic domain or unit of archaeological study* ... as individuals learn so they make society emphasis in original'' (155)
%@ 0745622682 (alk. paper)
@incollection{Barrett:2001,
abstract = {This volume provides an authoritative account of the current status of archaeological theory, as presented by some of its major exponents and innovators over the last decade. It summarizes recent developments and looks to the future, exploring some of the cutting-edge ideas at the forefront of the discipline.
While few practitioners in theoretical archaeology would still argue for a unified disciplinary approach, few volumes have explored the full range of emerging perspectives. This volume, however, captures the diversity of contemporary archaeological theory. Some authors argue for an approach close to the natural sciences, others for an engagement with cultural debate about representation of the past. Some minimize the relevance of culture to societal change, while others see it as central; some focus on the contingent and the local, others on long-term evolution.
The volume also reflects archaeology's new openness to external influences, as well as the desire to contribute to wider debates. The contributors examine ways in which archaeological evidence contributes to theories of evolutionary psychology, as well as to the social sciences in general, where theories of social relationships, agency, landscape and identity are informed by the long-term perspective of archaeology.},
added-at = {2010-03-02T17:25:53.000+0100},
address = {Cambridge, UK},
annote = {- individual learning or decision making that is the hallmark of the agent-based model: '*the social totality should not form the basic domain or unit of archaeological study* ... as individuals learn so they make society [emphasis in original]'' (155)},
author = {Barrett, John},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://www.polity.co.uk/book.asp?ref=0745622682},
bdsk-url-2 = {http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy042/2003427902.html},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b3c5fb8614d65530e9e3fe12b1b097b4/jrennstich},
booktitle = {Archaeological theory today},
call-number = {CC72},
date-added = {2009-12-19 12:12:55 -0500},
date-modified = {2010-02-28 21:03:29 -0500},
dewey-call-number = {930.1},
editor = {Hodder, Ian},
genre = {Archaeology},
interhash = {3e55e0e9d784516de0aa0e32b2ba9375},
intrahash = {b3c5fb8614d65530e9e3fe12b1b097b4},
isbn = {0745622682 (alk. paper)},
keywords = {agency agent-based archaeology complexity modeling theory},
library-id = {2003427902},
pages = {141--164},
publisher = {Polity},
timestamp = {2010-03-04T19:40:37.000+0100},
title = {Agency, the Duality of Structure and the Problem of the Archaeological Record},
year = 2001
}