%0 Journal Article %1 https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/14099 %A Klengel, Ernesto %A Wenckebach, Johanna %D 2021 %I Italian Labour Law e-Journal %J Italian Labour Law e-Journal %K Künstliche_Intelligenz Mitbestimmung algorithmic_management artificial_intelligence co-determination collective_regulation data_protection digital_transition workplace_democracy works_council %N 2 %P 157-171 %R 10.6092/ISSN.1561-8048/14099 %T Artificial intelligence, work, power imbalance and democracy – why co-determination is essential %U https://illej.unibo.it/article/view/14099 %V 14 %X Artificial intelligence (AI) has growing impact on working life. Risks of job losses, discrimination, data protection violations, surveillance pressure and health hazards require legal regulation. But which legal framework is necessary to effectively protect the rights and interests of workers? Workplace co-determination can help to minimize risks and reap the benefits of AI systems. It is therefore a problem that collective, co-determinated solutions do not seem to be considered in the drafting of the AI Act at EU level. This does not live up to the aspirations currently expressed in the European Pillar of Social Rights, and some member states go decidedly further, too. Fair AI requires involvement and empowerment of the workforce. Otherwise, the intended "human-centered" approach to AI in the world of work remains just a phrase.

@article{https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/14099, abstract = {Artificial intelligence (AI) has growing impact on working life. Risks of job losses, discrimination, data protection violations, surveillance pressure and health hazards require legal regulation. But which legal framework is necessary to effectively protect the rights and interests of workers? Workplace co-determination can help to minimize risks and reap the benefits of AI systems. It is therefore a problem that collective, co-determinated solutions do not seem to be considered in the drafting of the AI Act at EU level. This does not live up to the aspirations currently expressed in the European Pillar of Social Rights, and some member states go decidedly further, too. Fair AI requires involvement and empowerment of the workforce. Otherwise, the intended "human-centered" approach to AI in the world of work remains just a phrase.}, added-at = {2021-12-22T18:32:12.000+0100}, author = {Klengel, Ernesto and Wenckebach, Johanna}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a5c7a7133cb69486e4f38c818870497e/meneteqel}, copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}, doi = {10.6092/ISSN.1561-8048/14099}, interhash = {3d022fb387399723d0c546dfd075799f}, intrahash = {a5c7a7133cb69486e4f38c818870497e}, journal = {Italian Labour Law e-Journal}, keywords = {Künstliche_Intelligenz Mitbestimmung algorithmic_management artificial_intelligence co-determination collective_regulation data_protection digital_transition workplace_democracy works_council}, language = {en}, number = 2, pages = {157-171}, publisher = {Italian Labour Law e-Journal}, timestamp = {2021-12-22T18:32:12.000+0100}, title = {Artificial intelligence, work, power imbalance and democracy – why co-determination is essential}, url = {https://illej.unibo.it/article/view/14099}, volume = 14, year = 2021 }