Article,

Principles: when there should be no difference--how to fail to reject the null hypothesis.

.
Trends in pharmacological sciences, 27 (5): 274-8 (May 2006)4658<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 7906158; RF: 4; 2005/09/05 received; 2006/02/28 revised; 2006/03/21 accepted; 2006/04/03 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Tests d&#039;equivalència.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2006.03.006

Abstract

It is common to perform experiments in which a 'success' is claimed when the null hypothesis is discarded. However, there is a category of experiment that has become important in which a success is when the null hypothesis is not rejected. Failing to discard the null hypothesis is different from proving it to be valid, a distinction that is particularly important in experiments in which any inadequacy of experimental design or implementation enhances the likelihood of a success. The appropriate analysis of such experiments tests for evidence of the validity of the null hypothesis rather than simply failing to find evidence against it.

Tags

Users

  • @jepcastel

Comments and Reviews