Abstract
Interval training consists of doing high intensity exercises over a period and between periods of exercise pausing during a
percentage of the workout being active or not, since the continuous training is based on doing workout with moderate intensity
and without pause keeping the rhythm training. In this sense, the objective of this research has a comparative effect between
the two methods, in four topics: heart rate, Vo2
, we will measure the level of perception of effort of the athletes, body weight
evaluation. The results of heart rate monitoring where it was assessed every month after a training session, in which continuous
training had a better result, but without great differences between the two; VO2
that the measurement was made after the test of
the Mcardle bench in which the athletes who train in an intervalized way obtained better results and maintaining the average of
each other. Regarding body weight, they did not have significant difference for any of the methodologies and all lost at least the
minimum weight. The subjective perception and efforts the group that does continuous training pointed to lower PSE results,
but also without large differences between groups, levels between the two groups ranged from 7 to 9. With these results it was
concluded that both training methods produce positive results for female futsal athletes, with only a small advantage of continuous training
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).