Article,

Comparison Between Interval and Continuous Method of Amateur Women's Futsal Team Training

, , , , and .
Journal of Yoga, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, 2018 (06): 05 (07 November, 2018 07 November, 2018)

Abstract

Interval training consists of doing high intensity exercises over a period and between periods of exercise pausing during a percentage of the workout being active or not, since the continuous training is based on doing workout with moderate intensity and without pause keeping the rhythm training. In this sense, the objective of this research has a comparative effect between the two methods, in four topics: heart rate, Vo2 , we will measure the level of perception of effort of the athletes, body weight evaluation. The results of heart rate monitoring where it was assessed every month after a training session, in which continuous training had a better result, but without great differences between the two; VO2 that the measurement was made after the test of the Mcardle bench in which the athletes who train in an intervalized way obtained better results and maintaining the average of each other. Regarding body weight, they did not have significant difference for any of the methodologies and all lost at least the minimum weight. The subjective perception and efforts the group that does continuous training pointed to lower PSE results, but also without large differences between groups, levels between the two groups ranged from 7 to 9. With these results it was concluded that both training methods produce positive results for female futsal athletes, with only a small advantage of continuous training

Tags

Users

  • @alyssacarter

Comments and Reviews