Automated re-invention of six patented optical lens
systems using genetic programming
J. Koza, S. Al-Sakran, and L. Jones. GECCO 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on
Genetic and evolutionary computation, 2, page 1953--1960. Washington DC, USA, ACM Press, (25-29 June 2005)
Abstract
genetic programming was used as an invention machine
to automatically synthesis complete designs for six
optical lens systems that duplicated the functionality
of previously patented lens systems. The automatic
synthesis was done "from scratch". that is, without
starting from a preexisting good design and without
pre-specifying the number of lenses, the physical
layout of the lenses, the numerical parameters of the
lenses, or the non-numerical parameters of the lenses.
One of the six genetically evolved lens systems
infringed a previously issued patent; three contained
many of the essential features of the patents, without
infringing; and the others were non-infringing novel
designs that duplicated (or improved upon) the
performance specifications contained in the patents.
One of the six patents was issued in the 21st-century.
The six designs were created in a substantially similar
and routine way, suggesting that the approach used may
have widespread utility. The genetically evolved
designs are instances of human competitive results
produced by genetic programming in the field of optical
design.
GECCO 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on
Genetic and evolutionary computation
year
2005
month
25-29 June
pages
1953--1960
publisher
ACM Press
volume
2
organisation
ACM SIGEVO (formerly ISGEC)
publisher_address
New York, NY, 10286-1405, USA
isbn
1-59593-010-8
notes
GECCO-2005 A joint meeting of the fourteenth
international conference on genetic algorithms
(ICGA-2005) and the tenth annual genetic programming
conference (GP-2005).
ACM Order Number 910052.
Lindenmayer, LOGO. KOJAC, OSLO. population 75000.
multiple types of domain specific mutation. Ludewig,
Koizumi-Wantanabe, Nagler, Scidmore, Konig and
Tackaberry-Muller eyepiece,
%0 Conference Paper
%1 1068337
%A Koza, John R.
%A Al-Sakran, Sameer H.
%A Jones, Lee W.
%B GECCO 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on
Genetic and evolutionary computation
%C Washington DC, USA
%D 2005
%E Beyer, Hans-Georg
%E O'Reilly, Una-May
%E Arnold, Dirk V.
%E Banzhaf, Wolfgang
%E Blum, Christian
%E Bonabeau, Eric W.
%E Cantu-Paz, Erick
%E Dasgupta, Dipankar
%E Deb, Kalyanmoy
%E Foster, James A.
%E de
Jong, Edwin D.
%E Lipson, Hod
%E Llora, Xavier
%E Mancoridis, Spiros
%E Pelikan, Martin
%E Raidl, Guenther R.
%E Soule, Terence
%E Tyrrell, Andy M.
%E Watson, Jean-Paul
%E Zitzler, Eckart
%I ACM Press
%K Applications, Real World algorithms, automated design, genetic human-competitive invention lens machine, optical patents programming, results, system,
%P 1953--1960
%T Automated re-invention of six patented optical lens
systems using genetic programming
%U http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1068009.1068337
%V 2
%X genetic programming was used as an invention machine
to automatically synthesis complete designs for six
optical lens systems that duplicated the functionality
of previously patented lens systems. The automatic
synthesis was done "from scratch". that is, without
starting from a preexisting good design and without
pre-specifying the number of lenses, the physical
layout of the lenses, the numerical parameters of the
lenses, or the non-numerical parameters of the lenses.
One of the six genetically evolved lens systems
infringed a previously issued patent; three contained
many of the essential features of the patents, without
infringing; and the others were non-infringing novel
designs that duplicated (or improved upon) the
performance specifications contained in the patents.
One of the six patents was issued in the 21st-century.
The six designs were created in a substantially similar
and routine way, suggesting that the approach used may
have widespread utility. The genetically evolved
designs are instances of human competitive results
produced by genetic programming in the field of optical
design.
%@ 1-59593-010-8
@inproceedings{1068337,
abstract = {genetic programming was used as an invention machine
to automatically synthesis complete designs for six
optical lens systems that duplicated the functionality
of previously patented lens systems. The automatic
synthesis was done {"}from scratch{"}. that is, without
starting from a preexisting good design and without
pre-specifying the number of lenses, the physical
layout of the lenses, the numerical parameters of the
lenses, or the non-numerical parameters of the lenses.
One of the six genetically evolved lens systems
infringed a previously issued patent; three contained
many of the essential features of the patents, without
infringing; and the others were non-infringing novel
designs that duplicated (or improved upon) the
performance specifications contained in the patents.
One of the six patents was issued in the 21st-century.
The six designs were created in a substantially similar
and routine way, suggesting that the approach used may
have widespread utility. The genetically evolved
designs are instances of human competitive results
produced by genetic programming in the field of optical
design.},
added-at = {2008-06-19T17:35:00.000+0200},
address = {Washington DC, USA},
author = {Koza, John R. and Al-Sakran, Sameer H. and Jones, Lee W.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24166b3af3c00438d8ccf86c5d461df84/brazovayeye},
booktitle = {{GECCO 2005}: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on
Genetic and evolutionary computation},
editor = {Beyer, Hans-Georg and O'Reilly, Una-May and Arnold, Dirk V. and Banzhaf, Wolfgang and Blum, Christian and Bonabeau, Eric W. and Cantu-Paz, Erick and Dasgupta, Dipankar and Deb, Kalyanmoy and Foster, James A. and {de
Jong}, Edwin D. and Lipson, Hod and Llora, Xavier and Mancoridis, Spiros and Pelikan, Martin and Raidl, Guenther R. and Soule, Terence and Tyrrell, Andy M. and Watson, Jean-Paul and Zitzler, Eckart},
interhash = {e605658a7988c5c6f71762a521ec1b84},
intrahash = {4166b3af3c00438d8ccf86c5d461df84},
isbn = {1-59593-010-8},
keywords = {Applications, Real World algorithms, automated design, genetic human-competitive invention lens machine, optical patents programming, results, system,},
month = {25-29 June},
notes = {GECCO-2005 A joint meeting of the fourteenth
international conference on genetic algorithms
(ICGA-2005) and the tenth annual genetic programming
conference (GP-2005).
ACM Order Number 910052.
Lindenmayer, LOGO. KOJAC, OSLO. population 75000.
multiple types of domain specific mutation. Ludewig,
Koizumi-Wantanabe, Nagler, Scidmore, Konig and
Tackaberry-Muller eyepiece,},
organisation = {ACM SIGEVO (formerly ISGEC)},
pages = {1953--1960},
publisher = {ACM Press},
publisher_address = {New York, NY, 10286-1405, USA},
timestamp = {2008-06-19T17:44:18.000+0200},
title = {Automated re-invention of six patented optical lens
systems using genetic programming},
url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1068009.1068337},
volume = 2,
year = 2005
}