Abstract
This article reconsiders Craig's (1999) constitutive metamodel of communication theory as a field in light of Russill's (2004, 2005) critique and proposal of a pragmatist tradition of communication theory. After reviewing the constitutive metamodel, I examine Russill's argument and assess its implications for a reconstructed field of communication theory including pragmatism as a distinct tradition. I argue, in conclusion, that the problems of pluralistic community in the field of communication theory are not unconnected to the corresponding problems in society generally.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).