Artikel,

Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms.

, , , , , und .
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 32 (3): 437-40 (März 2011)6281<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00537134; GR: Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Canada; JID: 8003708; 2011/02/17 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Anàlisi de dades; Categorització.
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2425

Zusammenfassung

In medical research analyses, continuous variables are often converted into categoric variables by grouping values into ≥2 categories. The simplicity achieved by creating ≥2 artificial groups has a cost: Grouping may create rather than avoid problems. In particular, dichotomization leads to a considerable loss of power and incomplete correction for confounding factors. The use of data-derived öptimal" cut-points can lead to serious bias and should at least be tested on independent observations to assess their validity. Both problems are illustrated by the way the results of a registry on unruptured intracranial aneurysms are commonly used. Extreme caution should restrict the application of such results to clinical decision-making. Categorization of continuous data, especially dichotomization, is unnecessary for statistical analysis. Continuous explanatory variables should be left alone in statistical models.

Tags

Nutzer

  • @jepcastel

Kommentare und Rezensionen