Abstract
One of the central challenges of computer science is
to build a system that can automatically create
computer programs that are competitive with those
produced by humans. This paper presents a candidate set
of criteria that identify when a machine-created
solution is competitive with a human-produced result.
We argue that the field of design is a useful testbed
for determining whether an automated technique can
produce results that are competitive with
human-produced results. We present several results that
are competitive with the products of human creativity
and inventiveness. This claim is supported by the fact
that each of the results infringe on previously issued
patents.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).