%0 Journal Article %1 fiolderoque2024evaluation %A Fiol deRoque, Maria A %A Valderas, José M %A Arias de la Torre, Jorge %A Serrano-Ripoll, Maria J %A Gens-Barberà, Montserrat %A Sánchez-Freire, Encarna %A Martín-Luján, Francisco M %A Olry de Labry, Antonio %A Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio %C England %D 2024 %J The European journal of general practice %K grapp-caib %N 1 %P 2296573--2296573 %R 10.1080/13814788.2023.2296573 %T Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire %U https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38197321 %V 30 %X BACKGROUND: Patients provide a unique, irreplaceable, and essential perspective in evaluating patient safety. The suite of Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) tools are a notable exception to the scarcity of patient-reported patient safety measures. Full evaluation of their performance has only been attempted for the English version, thereby limiting its international applicability. OBJECTIVES: To assess the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact. METHODS: Cross-sectional validation study. We used Classical Test Theory methods to examine scale score distribution, internal consistency, and construct validity; and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods to further explore construct validity. RESULTS: 3287 patients completed the Spanish version, and 1007 the Catalan version. Similar results were obtained for both versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a single construct for each scale. The correlations between PREOS-PC-Compact scales and known group analysis suggested adequate construct validity (inconclusive for known groups at the provider level). All four multi-item scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability (α > 0.7), which was only confirmed for test-retest reliability for 'Practice activation.' A sample between 60-90 patients per practice was estimated sufficient to produce scores with reliability > 0.7 for all scales except for harm scales. IRT models showed disordered thresholds for 'Practice activation' and 'Harm burden' but showed excellent fit after reducing the response categories. CONCLUSION: The Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact are broadly valid and reliable tools to measure patient safety in Spanish primary care centres; confirmation of lower-than-expected test-rest reliability merits further examination .

@article{fiolderoque2024evaluation, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Patients provide a unique, irreplaceable, and essential perspective in evaluating patient safety. The suite of Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) tools are a notable exception to the scarcity of patient-reported patient safety measures. Full evaluation of their performance has only been attempted for the English version, thereby limiting its international applicability. OBJECTIVES: To assess the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact. METHODS: Cross-sectional validation study. We used Classical Test Theory methods to examine scale score distribution, internal consistency, and construct validity; and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods to further explore construct validity. RESULTS: 3287 patients completed the Spanish version, and 1007 the Catalan version. Similar results were obtained for both versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a single construct for each scale. The correlations between PREOS-PC-Compact scales and known group analysis suggested adequate construct validity (inconclusive for known groups at the provider level). All four multi-item scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability (α > 0.7), which was only confirmed for test-retest reliability for 'Practice activation.' A sample between 60-90 patients per practice was estimated sufficient to produce scores with reliability > 0.7 for all scales except for harm scales. IRT models showed disordered thresholds for 'Practice activation' and 'Harm burden' but showed excellent fit after reducing the response categories. CONCLUSION: The Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact are broadly valid and reliable tools to measure patient safety in Spanish primary care centres; confirmation of lower-than-expected test-rest reliability merits further examination .}, added-at = {2024-01-15T09:10:28.000+0100}, address = {England}, author = {Fiol deRoque, Maria A and Valderas, José M and Arias de la Torre, Jorge and Serrano-Ripoll, Maria J and Gens-Barberà, Montserrat and Sánchez-Freire, Encarna and Martín-Luján, Francisco M and Olry de Labry, Antonio and Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2111fa45449f0b17b08605ab90aec7ee4/nachoricci}, comment = {38197321[pmid] PMC10783822[pmcid]}, description = {Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire - PubMed}, doi = {10.1080/13814788.2023.2296573}, interhash = {771d0956e79a6d81fbbca095ce7d2f12}, intrahash = {111fa45449f0b17b08605ab90aec7ee4}, issn = {13814788}, journal = {The European journal of general practice}, keywords = {grapp-caib}, month = dec, number = 1, pages = {2296573--2296573}, timestamp = {2024-01-15T09:10:28.000+0100}, title = {Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire}, url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38197321}, volume = 30, year = 2024 }