Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Relations in Knowledge Organization Systems
I. Peters, and K. Weller. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis, 59 (2):
100-107(2008)
Abstract
Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established – but in a way restricted and vague – relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies
and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.
%0 Journal Article
%1 peters-paradigmatic-2008
%A Peters, Isabella
%A Weller, Katrin
%D 2008
%J Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis
%K KOS Knowledge System organization paradigmatic syntagmatic wismasys0809
%N 2
%P 100-107
%T Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Relations in Knowledge Organization Systems
%U http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/infowiss/admin/public_dateien/files/56/1204547334paradigmat.pdf
%V 59
%X Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established – but in a way restricted and vague – relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies
and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.
@article{peters-paradigmatic-2008,
abstract = {Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established – but in a way restricted and vague – relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies
and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.},
added-at = {2008-11-05T18:01:04.000+0100},
author = {Peters, Isabella and Weller, Katrin},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21b50e5ab8fc21f94bd512b012df69ec8/juver},
interhash = {12015b43edecb45bae1b3e62a393340b},
intrahash = {1b50e5ab8fc21f94bd512b012df69ec8},
journal = {Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis},
keywords = {KOS Knowledge System organization paradigmatic syntagmatic wismasys0809},
number = 2,
pages = {100-107},
timestamp = {2008-11-05T18:01:04.000+0100},
title = {Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Relations in Knowledge Organization Systems},
url = {http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/infowiss/admin/public_dateien/files/56/1204547334paradigmat.pdf},
volume = 59,
year = 2008
}