%0 Conference Paper %1 Gajos_2022 %A Gajos, Krzysztof Z. %A Mamykina, Lena %B 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces %D 2022 %I ACM %K explanation iui2022 recommender %P 794-806 %R 10.1145/3490099.3511138 %T Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learning %U https://doi.org/10.1145%2F3490099.3511138 %X When people receive advice while making difficult decisions, they often make better decisions in the moment and also increase their knowledge in the process. However, such incidental learning can only occur when people cognitively engage with the information they receive and process this information thoughtfully. How do people process the information and advice they receive from AI, and do they engage with it deeply enough to enable learning? To answer these questions, we conducted three experiments in which individuals were asked to make nutritional decisions and received simulated AI recommendations and explanations. In the first experiment, we found that when people were presented with both a recommendation and an explanation before making their choice, they made better decisions than they did when they received no such help, but they did not learn. In the second experiment, participants first made their own choice, and only then saw a recommendation and an explanation from AI; this condition also resulted in improved decisions, but no learning. However, in our third experiment, participants were presented with just an AI explanation but no recommendation and had to arrive at their own decision. This condition led to both more accurate decisions and learning gains. We hypothesize that learning gains in this condition were due to deeper engagement with explanations needed to arrive at the decisions. This work provides some of the most direct evidence to date that it may not be sufficient to include explanations together with AI-generated recommendation to ensure that people engage carefully with the AI-provided information. This work also presents one technique that enables incidental learning and, by implication, can help people process AI recommendations and explanations more carefully.

@inproceedings{Gajos_2022, abstract = {When people receive advice while making difficult decisions, they often make better decisions in the moment and also increase their knowledge in the process. However, such incidental learning can only occur when people cognitively engage with the information they receive and process this information thoughtfully. How do people process the information and advice they receive from AI, and do they engage with it deeply enough to enable learning? To answer these questions, we conducted three experiments in which individuals were asked to make nutritional decisions and received simulated AI recommendations and explanations. In the first experiment, we found that when people were presented with both a recommendation and an explanation before making their choice, they made better decisions than they did when they received no such help, but they did not learn. In the second experiment, participants first made their own choice, and only then saw a recommendation and an explanation from AI; this condition also resulted in improved decisions, but no learning. However, in our third experiment, participants were presented with just an AI explanation but no recommendation and had to arrive at their own decision. This condition led to both more accurate decisions and learning gains. We hypothesize that learning gains in this condition were due to deeper engagement with explanations needed to arrive at the decisions. This work provides some of the most direct evidence to date that it may not be sufficient to include explanations together with AI-generated recommendation to ensure that people engage carefully with the AI-provided information. This work also presents one technique that enables incidental learning and, by implication, can help people process AI recommendations and explanations more carefully.}, added-at = {2023-06-05T05:43:43.000+0200}, author = {Gajos, Krzysztof Z. and Mamykina, Lena}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b50ef25e1a040ddfa46ea0ab8b6fb9cc/brusilovsky}, booktitle = {27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces}, description = {Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learning | 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces}, doi = {10.1145/3490099.3511138}, interhash = {1880a68db80ef54f66adc9af1a12f975}, intrahash = {b50ef25e1a040ddfa46ea0ab8b6fb9cc}, keywords = {explanation iui2022 recommender}, month = mar, note = {Interesting.. Explanations could help you to choose for yourself and learn. Just like we do in MG}, pages = {794-806}, publisher = {{ACM}}, timestamp = {2023-06-05T05:43:43.000+0200}, title = {Do People Engage Cognitively with {AI}? Impact of {AI} Assistance on Incidental Learning}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1145%2F3490099.3511138}, year = 2022 }