%0 Journal Article %1 Hays1998 %A Hays, R. M. %A McLaughlin, J. F. %A Bjornson, K. F. %A Stephens, K. %A Roberts, T. S. %A Price, R. %D 1998 %J Dev Med Child Neurol %K Adolescent; Adult; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Electromyography; Electrophysiology; Female; Humans; Male; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Muscle, Skeletal; Prospective Rhizotomy; Severity of Illness Index; Spinal Nerve Roots; Treatment Outcome %N 4 %P 233--238 %T Electrophysiological monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy, and spasticity and GMFM performance. %V 40 %X The relation between abnormal electrophysiological responses to intraoperative stimulation during selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) and the degree of spasticity and motor dysfunction was explored in 92 children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) who underwent SDR at a single center. The proportion of abnormally responding rootlets was compared with the degree of spasticity measured with the modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and with the spasticity measurement system (SMS) at discrete segmental levels. Motor impairment measured with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) was also compared with the proportion of abnormally responding dorsal rootlets. A consistent relation between the proportion of abnormally responding rootlets and the degree of spasticity and gross motor abnormality at the corresponding muscles could not be demonstrated. There was also no consistent association between the proportion of rootlets ablated during SDR and the change in spasticity measured with the MAS and SMS, or to the change in motor function as measured with the GMFM. These data suggest that the intraoperative monitoring technique most commonly used for SDR is unlikely to identify accurately those neural elements which contribute to spasticity in children with CP.

@article{Hays1998, abstract = {The relation between abnormal electrophysiological responses to intraoperative stimulation during selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) and the degree of spasticity and motor dysfunction was explored in 92 children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) who underwent SDR at a single center. The proportion of abnormally responding rootlets was compared with the degree of spasticity measured with the modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and with the spasticity measurement system (SMS) at discrete segmental levels. Motor impairment measured with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) was also compared with the proportion of abnormally responding dorsal rootlets. A consistent relation between the proportion of abnormally responding rootlets and the degree of spasticity and gross motor abnormality at the corresponding muscles could not be demonstrated. There was also no consistent association between the proportion of rootlets ablated during SDR and the change in spasticity measured with the MAS and SMS, or to the change in motor function as measured with the GMFM. These data suggest that the intraoperative monitoring technique most commonly used for SDR is unlikely to identify accurately those neural elements which contribute to spasticity in children with CP.}, added-at = {2014-07-19T19:34:58.000+0200}, author = {Hays, R. M. and McLaughlin, J. F. and Bjornson, K. F. and Stephens, K. and Roberts, T. S. and Price, R.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/214fd6d6e0875b32c9748b3527520ac40/ar0berts}, groups = {public}, interhash = {1eb74f02d4bed889cc9b709b03b0c6fb}, intrahash = {14fd6d6e0875b32c9748b3527520ac40}, journal = {Dev Med Child Neurol}, keywords = {Adolescent; Adult; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Electromyography; Electrophysiology; Female; Humans; Male; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Muscle, Skeletal; Prospective Rhizotomy; Severity of Illness Index; Spinal Nerve Roots; Treatment Outcome}, month = Apr, number = 4, pages = {233--238}, pmid = {9593494}, timestamp = {2014-07-19T19:34:58.000+0200}, title = {Electrophysiological monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy, and spasticity and GMFM performance.}, username = {ar0berts}, volume = 40, year = 1998 }