%0 Journal Article %1 unknown %A Bond, Melissa %A Khosravi, Hassan %A Laat, Maarten %A Bergdahl, Nina %A Negrea, Violeta %A Oxley, Emily %A Pham, Phuong %A Chong, Sin Wang %A Siemens, George %D 2023 %K ai artificial education he higher intelligence review %R 10.13140/RG.2.2.31921.56162/1 %T A Meta Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour %U https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374548244_A_Meta_Systematic_Review_of_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Higher_Education_A_call_for_increased_ethics_collaboration_and_rigour %X Although the field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has a substantial history as a research domain, never before has the rapid evolution of AI applications in education sparked such prominent public discourse. Given the growing AIEd literature base in higher education, it is important to ensure that the field has a solid research and conceptual grounding as AI adoption increases. This review of reviews is the first comprehensive meta review to explore the scope and nature of AIEd in higher education (AIHEd) research, by synthesising secondary research (e.g., systematic reviews), indexed in the Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, EBSCOHost, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect and ACM Digital Library, or captured through snowballing in OpenAlex, ResearchGate and Google Scholar. Reviews were included if they synthesised applications of AI solely in formal higher or continuing education, were published in English between 2018 and July 2023, were journal articles or full conference papers, and if they had a method section. 66 publications were included for data extraction and synthesis in EPPI Reviewer, which were predominantly systematic reviews (66.7%), published by authors from North America (27.3%), conducted in teams (89.4%) in mostly domestic-only collaborations (71.2%). Findings show that these reviews mostly focused on AIHEd generally (47.0%) or Profiling and Prediction (28.8%) as thematic foci, however key findings indicated a predominance of the use of Adaptive Systems and Personalisation in higher education. Research gaps identified suggest a need for greater ethical, methodological, and contextual considerations within future research, alongside interdisciplinary approaches to AIHEd application. Suggestions are provided to guide future primary and secondary research.

@article{unknown, abstract = {Although the field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has a substantial history as a research domain, never before has the rapid evolution of AI applications in education sparked such prominent public discourse. Given the growing AIEd literature base in higher education, it is important to ensure that the field has a solid research and conceptual grounding as AI adoption increases. This review of reviews is the first comprehensive meta review to explore the scope and nature of AIEd in higher education (AIHEd) research, by synthesising secondary research (e.g., systematic reviews), indexed in the Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, EBSCOHost, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect and ACM Digital Library, or captured through snowballing in OpenAlex, ResearchGate and Google Scholar. Reviews were included if they synthesised applications of AI solely in formal higher or continuing education, were published in English between 2018 and July 2023, were journal articles or full conference papers, and if they had a method section. 66 publications were included for data extraction and synthesis in EPPI Reviewer, which were predominantly systematic reviews (66.7%), published by authors from North America (27.3%), conducted in teams (89.4%) in mostly domestic-only collaborations (71.2%). Findings show that these reviews mostly focused on AIHEd generally (47.0%) or Profiling and Prediction (28.8%) as thematic foci, however key findings indicated a predominance of the use of Adaptive Systems and Personalisation in higher education. Research gaps identified suggest a need for greater ethical, methodological, and contextual considerations within future research, alongside interdisciplinary approaches to AIHEd application. Suggestions are provided to guide future primary and secondary research.}, added-at = {2023-12-07T18:31:34.000+0100}, author = {Bond, Melissa and Khosravi, Hassan and Laat, Maarten and Bergdahl, Nina and Negrea, Violeta and Oxley, Emily and Pham, Phuong and Chong, Sin Wang and Siemens, George}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a86f0c89330a36545fb19e7c25f1e806/yish}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.31921.56162/1}, interhash = {59f8ad92ea5d2e6cb5071dee2ce9f530}, intrahash = {a86f0c89330a36545fb19e7c25f1e806}, keywords = {ai artificial education he higher intelligence review}, month = {10}, timestamp = {2023-12-07T18:34:09.000+0100}, title = {A Meta Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour}, url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374548244_A_Meta_Systematic_Review_of_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Higher_Education_A_call_for_increased_ethics_collaboration_and_rigour}, year = 2023 }