Overestimation/underestimation of time: concept confusion hoodwink
conclusion
B. Pande, and A. Pati. Biological Rhythm Research, 41 (5):
379--390(January 2010)
Abstract
Cognitive science is emerging as one of the engaging areas of research
in the domain of neurosciences, human behavior and chronobiology.
Mechanisms of short-term time perception continue to baffle scientists
in these disciplines. The wide arrays of methodologies used to ascertain
human abilities to estimate short-time intervals give rise to diverse
interpretation of research outputs. The frequently used terminologies,
viz., over- or under-estimation/production or reproduction seem to
be the profound cause for misinterpretation and misconception of
results. In this article we elucidate research carried out on short-interval
time estimation and resolve conceptual misapprehensions on its underlying
mechanisms.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Pande2010
%A Pande, Babita
%A Pati, Atanu
%D 2010
%I Taylor & Francis
%J Biological Rhythm Research
%K chronobiology, timing
%N 5
%P 379--390
%T Overestimation/underestimation of time: concept confusion hoodwink
conclusion
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09291010903299111
%V 41
%X Cognitive science is emerging as one of the engaging areas of research
in the domain of neurosciences, human behavior and chronobiology.
Mechanisms of short-term time perception continue to baffle scientists
in these disciplines. The wide arrays of methodologies used to ascertain
human abilities to estimate short-time intervals give rise to diverse
interpretation of research outputs. The frequently used terminologies,
viz., over- or under-estimation/production or reproduction seem to
be the profound cause for misinterpretation and misconception of
results. In this article we elucidate research carried out on short-interval
time estimation and resolve conceptual misapprehensions on its underlying
mechanisms.
@article{Pande2010,
__markedentry = {[freesurfer:6]},
abstract = {Cognitive science is emerging as one of the engaging areas of research
in the domain of neurosciences, human behavior and chronobiology.
Mechanisms of short-term time perception continue to baffle scientists
in these disciplines. The wide arrays of methodologies used to ascertain
human abilities to estimate short-time intervals give rise to diverse
interpretation of research outputs. The frequently used terminologies,
viz., over- or under-estimation/production or reproduction seem to
be the profound cause for misinterpretation and misconception of
results. In this article we elucidate research carried out on short-interval
time estimation and resolve conceptual misapprehensions on its underlying
mechanisms.},
added-at = {2012-02-24T14:11:06.000+0100},
author = {Pande, Babita and Pati, Atanu},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2352418b83d9e8eb9789abe12de2f8a62/jakspa},
interhash = {5f16038686f4e24d1e2319d6db40dc06},
intrahash = {352418b83d9e8eb9789abe12de2f8a62},
journal = {Biological Rhythm Research},
keywords = {chronobiology, timing},
month = jan,
number = 5,
owner = {freesurfer},
pages = {379--390},
publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
refid = {citeulike:10381990},
timestamp = {2012-02-24T14:11:08.000+0100},
title = {Overestimation/underestimation of time: concept confusion hoodwink
conclusion},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09291010903299111},
volume = 41,
year = 2010
}