Abstract
This paper describes a biologically inspired
domain-independent technique, called genetic
programming, that automatically creates computer
programs to solve problems. We argue that the field of
design is a useful testbed for determining whether an
automated technique can produce results that are
competitive with human-produced results. We present
several results that are competitive with the products
of human creativity and inventiveness. This claim is
supported by the fact that each of the results infringe
on previously issued patents. This paper presents a
candidate set of criteria that identify when a
machine-created solution to a problem is competitive
with a human-produced result.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).