Zusammenfassung
Autoethnography has recently become a popular form of qualitative research.
The current discourse on this genre of research refers almost exclusively to
“evocative autoethnography” that draws upon postmodern sensibilities and
whose advocates distance themselves from realist and analytic ethnographic
traditions. The dominance of evocative autoethnography has obscured recog-
nition of the compatibility of autoethnographic research with more traditional
ethnographic practices. The author proposes the term analytic
autoethnography to refer to research in which the researcher is (1) a full mem-
ber in the research group or setting, (2) visible as such a member in published
texts, and (3) committed to developing theoretical understandings of broader
social phenomena. After briefly tracing the history of proto-autoethnographic
research among realist ethnographers, the author proposes five key features of
analytic autoethnography. He concludes with a consideration of the advan-
tages and limitations of this genre of qualitative research.
Nutzer