%0 Journal Article %1 noauthororeditor %A Wang1, Xiaolin %A and Xun Qiu2, %D 2013 %J International Journal of Information Technology, Modeling and Computing (IJITMC) %K Bare-bone Gaussia Lévy Optimization PSO Parn Reservoir Simulation Steam Stimulationticle Swarm %N 2 %P 01-11 %R 10.5121/ijitmc.2013.1204 %T APPLICATION OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION FOR ENHANCED CYCLIC STEAM STIMULATION IN A OFFSHORE HEAVY OIL RESERVOIR %U http://airccse.org/journal/ijitmc/papers/1213ijitmc04.pdf %V 1 %X Three different variations of PSO algorithms, i.e. Canonical, Gaussian Bare-bone and Lévy Bare-bone PSO, are tested to optimize the ultimate oil recovery of a large heavy oil reservoir. The performance of these algorithms was compared in terms of convergence behaviour and the final optimization results. It is found that, in general, all three types of PSO methods are able to improve the objective function. The best objective function is found by using the Canonical PSO, while the other two methods give similar results. The Gaussian Bare-bone PSO may picks positions that are far away from the optimal solution. The Lévy Bare-bone PSO has similar convergence behaviour as the Canonical PSO. For the specific optimization problem investigated in this study, it is found that the temperature of the injection steam, CO2 composition in the injection gas, and the gas injection rates have bigger impact on the objective function, while steam injection rate and the liquid production rate have less impact on the objective function.

@article{noauthororeditor, abstract = {Three different variations of PSO algorithms, i.e. Canonical, Gaussian Bare-bone and Lévy Bare-bone PSO, are tested to optimize the ultimate oil recovery of a large heavy oil reservoir. The performance of these algorithms was compared in terms of convergence behaviour and the final optimization results. It is found that, in general, all three types of PSO methods are able to improve the objective function. The best objective function is found by using the Canonical PSO, while the other two methods give similar results. The Gaussian Bare-bone PSO may picks positions that are far away from the optimal solution. The Lévy Bare-bone PSO has similar convergence behaviour as the Canonical PSO. For the specific optimization problem investigated in this study, it is found that the temperature of the injection steam, CO2 composition in the injection gas, and the gas injection rates have bigger impact on the objective function, while steam injection rate and the liquid production rate have less impact on the objective function.}, added-at = {2018-09-25T06:48:18.000+0200}, author = {Wang1, Xiaolin and and Xun Qiu2}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e81ab9f98b5c8306ffee1a99dad94c08/alexafedrica}, doi = {10.5121/ijitmc.2013.1204}, interhash = {b38ff07ecac1d5247c3af886471fdcd7}, intrahash = {e81ab9f98b5c8306ffee1a99dad94c08}, journal = {International Journal of Information Technology, Modeling and Computing (IJITMC)}, keywords = {Bare-bone Gaussia Lévy Optimization PSO Parn Reservoir Simulation Steam Stimulationticle Swarm}, month = may, number = 2, pages = {01-11}, timestamp = {2018-09-25T06:48:18.000+0200}, title = {APPLICATION OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION FOR ENHANCED CYCLIC STEAM STIMULATION IN A OFFSHORE HEAVY OIL RESERVOIR }, url = {http://airccse.org/journal/ijitmc/papers/1213ijitmc04.pdf}, volume = 1, year = 2013 }