%0 Journal Article %1 RN129 %A Richardson-Parry, A. %A Baas, C. %A Donde, S. %A Ferraiolo, B. %A Karmo, M. %A Maravic, Z. %A Münter, L. %A Ricci-Cabello, I. %A Silva, M. %A Tinianov, S. %A Valderas, J. M. %A Woodruff, S. %A van Vugt, J. %D 2023 %J Int J Equity Health %K grapp-caib %N 1 %P 19 %R 10.1186/s12939-023-01841-6 %T Interventions to reduce cancer screening inequities: the perspective and role of patients, advocacy groups, and empowerment organizations %V 22 %X BACKGROUND: Health inequities lead to low rates of cancer screening in certain populations, such as low-income and ethnic minority groups. Different interventions to address this have been developed with mixed results. However, interventions are not always developed in collaboration with the people they target. The aim of our article is to present the viewpoint of patients, survivors, advocates, and lay persons on interventions to increase cancer screening from a health inequity perspective. METHODS: We prepared talking points to guide discussions between coauthors, who included representatives from nine patient and survivor advocacy groups, organizations working for citizen/patient empowerment, and health equity experts. Perspectives and opinions were first collected through video conferencing meetings and a first draft of the paper was prepared. All authors, read through, revised, and discussed the contents to reach an agreement on the final perspectives to be presented. RESULTS: Several themes were identified: it is important to not view screening as a discrete event; barriers underlying an individual's access and willingness to undergo screening span across a continuum; individually tailored interventions are likely to be more effective than a one-size fits-all approach because they may better accommodate the person's personal beliefs, knowledge, behaviors, and preferences; targeting people who are unknown to medical services and largely unreachable is a major challenge; including professional patient advocacy groups and relevant lay persons in the cocreation of interventions at all stages of design, implementation, and evaluation is essential along with relevant stakeholders (healthcare professionals, researchers, local government and community organizations etc). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to address cancer screening inequity currently do not adequately solve the issue, especially from the viewpoint of patients, survivors, and lay persons. Several core pathways should be focused on when designing and implementing interventions: advancing individually tailored interventions; digital tools and social media; peer-based approaches; empowerment; addressing policy and system barriers; better design of interventions; and collaboration, including the involvement of patients and patient advocacy organizations.

@article{RN129, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Health inequities lead to low rates of cancer screening in certain populations, such as low-income and ethnic minority groups. Different interventions to address this have been developed with mixed results. However, interventions are not always developed in collaboration with the people they target. The aim of our article is to present the viewpoint of patients, survivors, advocates, and lay persons on interventions to increase cancer screening from a health inequity perspective. METHODS: We prepared talking points to guide discussions between coauthors, who included representatives from nine patient and survivor advocacy groups, organizations working for citizen/patient empowerment, and health equity experts. Perspectives and opinions were first collected through video conferencing meetings and a first draft of the paper was prepared. All authors, read through, revised, and discussed the contents to reach an agreement on the final perspectives to be presented. RESULTS: Several themes were identified: it is important to not view screening as a discrete event; barriers underlying an individual's access and willingness to undergo screening span across a continuum; individually tailored interventions are likely to be more effective than a one-size fits-all approach because they may better accommodate the person's personal beliefs, knowledge, behaviors, and preferences; targeting people who are unknown to medical services and largely unreachable is a major challenge; including professional patient advocacy groups and relevant lay persons in the cocreation of interventions at all stages of design, implementation, and evaluation is essential along with relevant stakeholders (healthcare professionals, researchers, local government and community organizations etc). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to address cancer screening inequity currently do not adequately solve the issue, especially from the viewpoint of patients, survivors, and lay persons. Several core pathways should be focused on when designing and implementing interventions: advancing individually tailored interventions; digital tools and social media; peer-based approaches; empowerment; addressing policy and system barriers; better design of interventions; and collaboration, including the involvement of patients and patient advocacy organizations.}, added-at = {2023-02-06T06:38:01.000+0100}, author = {Richardson-Parry, A. and Baas, C. and Donde, S. and Ferraiolo, B. and Karmo, M. and Maravic, Z. and Münter, L. and Ricci-Cabello, I. and Silva, M. and Tinianov, S. and Valderas, J. M. and Woodruff, S. and van Vugt, J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28b5f2fd9b18acb084b29625a320d1cd9/nachoricci}, doi = {10.1186/s12939-023-01841-6}, interhash = {d89802c939cce188b63ff5d44929490b}, intrahash = {8b5f2fd9b18acb084b29625a320d1cd9}, issn = {1475-9276}, journal = {Int J Equity Health}, keywords = {grapp-caib}, number = 1, pages = 19, timestamp = {2023-02-06T06:38:01.000+0100}, title = {Interventions to reduce cancer screening inequities: the perspective and role of patients, advocacy groups, and empowerment organizations}, type = {Journal Article}, volume = 22, year = 2023 }