A user-based document management system has been developed for small communities on the Web. The system is based on the free annotation of documents by users. A number of annotation support tools are used to suggest possible annotations, including suggesting terms from external ontologies. This paper outlines some evaluation data on how users actually interact with the system in annotating their document especially on the use of standard ontologies. Results indicate that although an established external taxonomy can be useful in proposing annotation terms, users appear to be very selective in their use of the terms proposed and to have little interest in adhering to the particular hierarchical structure provided.
Description
The perceived utility of standard ontologies in document management for specialized domains
%0 Journal Article
%1 kim06ontologies
%A Kim, Mihye
%A Compton, Paul
%C Duluth, MN, USA
%D 2006
%I Academic Press, Inc.
%J Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.
%K research.kr.ontologies research.publishing.contentMgmt
%N 1
%P 15--26
%R http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.006
%T The perceived utility of standard ontologies in document management for specialized domains
%U http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1126313
%V 64
%X A user-based document management system has been developed for small communities on the Web. The system is based on the free annotation of documents by users. A number of annotation support tools are used to suggest possible annotations, including suggesting terms from external ontologies. This paper outlines some evaluation data on how users actually interact with the system in annotating their document especially on the use of standard ontologies. Results indicate that although an established external taxonomy can be useful in proposing annotation terms, users appear to be very selective in their use of the terms proposed and to have little interest in adhering to the particular hierarchical structure provided.
@article{kim06ontologies,
abstract = {A user-based document management system has been developed for small communities on the Web. The system is based on the free annotation of documents by users. A number of annotation support tools are used to suggest possible annotations, including suggesting terms from external ontologies. This paper outlines some evaluation data on how users actually interact with the system in annotating their document especially on the use of standard ontologies. Results indicate that although an established external taxonomy can be useful in proposing annotation terms, users appear to be very selective in their use of the terms proposed and to have little interest in adhering to the particular hierarchical structure provided.},
added-at = {2009-06-25T16:48:52.000+0200},
address = {Duluth, MN, USA},
author = {Kim, Mihye and Compton, Paul},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e150652d658f0454617b3c6d1f414b3c/msn},
description = {The perceived utility of standard ontologies in document management for specialized domains},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.006},
file = {kim06ontologies.pdf:papers\\kim06ontologies.pdf:PDF},
interhash = {e2d5380e0f8f7b86cb5e940ee40205bf},
intrahash = {e150652d658f0454617b3c6d1f414b3c},
issn = {1071-5819},
journal = {Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.},
keywords = {research.kr.ontologies research.publishing.contentMgmt},
number = 1,
pages = {15--26},
publisher = {Academic Press, Inc.},
timestamp = {2009-06-25T16:48:52.000+0200},
title = {The perceived utility of standard ontologies in document management for specialized domains},
url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1126313},
volume = 64,
year = 2006
}