Abstract
~~~~~In an electrolyte solution the charge-charge structure factor obeys
$S_ZZ(k;T,\rho)$ $=0+\xi_Z,1^2k^2-\xi_Z,2^4k^4+...$ , where $\xi_Z,1$ and
$\xi_Z,2$ are the second- and fourth-moment charge-charge correlation lengths
depending on $T$ and the overall ion density $\rho$.
The vanishing of the leading term, the first Stillinger-Lovett (SL) sum rule 1,
simply reflects bulk electroneutrality.
The second SL rule 1, or second-moment condition,
dictates that $\xi_Z,1=\xi_D$, where the Debye
screening length $\xi_D$ is proportional to $k_BT/q_0^2\rho$~, $q_0$ being the
elementary charge.
~~~~~Our grandcanonical Monte Carlo simulations of a fully size and charge symmetric
1:1 (finely-discretized) hard-sphere electrolyte, or restricted primitive model 2,
impose electroneutrality,
so satisfying the first sum rule automatically. However, careful finite-size scaling analysis
of extensive histogram reweighted data
indicates that the second-moment condition is violated at criticality by approximately
10\%, $\xi_Z,1^c$ exceeding $\xi_D^c$. It is also found that $\xi_Z,2^4$ diverges to $+ınfty$
as $TT_c$, closely mirroring $S_NN(0)$, the density-density fluctuations. These
findings contradict Generalized Debye-H$\mboxu$ckel theory 3 and the exactly soluble charge-symmetric
spherical models 4, both of which support the second-moment condition at criticality and
the finiteness of the fourth-moment. Nevertheless, the observed behavior is strikingly similar to that
of the charge-asymmetric
spherical models 4.\\
1) F.H. Stillinger and R. Lovett, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 3858 (1968).\\
2) Y.C. Kim and M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 185703 (2004).\\
3) B.P. Lee and M.E. Fisher, Europhys. Lett. 39, 611 (1997).\\
4) J.-N. Aqua and M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 135702 (2004).
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).