Receiver design implementations are considered in terms of batch vs.
sequential processing strategies. It is shown that the batch processing
techniques improve performance characteristics of GNSS signal tracking
for a number of application areas. Particularly, flight test results
presented demonstrate that batch processing improves the GPS tracking
margin by 8 dB as compared to sequential tracking for the deep GPS/INS
integration mode that performs code and carrier phase tracking, and
data bit recovery.(more)
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Journal Article
%1 VanGraas2005
%A Van Graas, F.
%A Soloviev, A.
%A Uijt de Haag, M.
%A Gunawardena, S.
%A Braasch, M.
%D 2005
%J Proc. of the 18th ION GNSS Conf.
%K GPS, batchProcessing, satnav sequentialProcessing, softwareReceiver
%P 200-211
%T Comparison of Two Approaches for GNSS Receiver Algorithms: Batch
Processing and Sequential Processing Considerations
%X Receiver design implementations are considered in terms of batch vs.
sequential processing strategies. It is shown that the batch processing
techniques improve performance characteristics of GNSS signal tracking
for a number of application areas. Particularly, flight test results
presented demonstrate that batch processing improves the GPS tracking
margin by 8 dB as compared to sequential tracking for the deep GPS/INS
integration mode that performs code and carrier phase tracking, and
data bit recovery.
@article{VanGraas2005,
abstract = {Receiver design implementations are considered in terms of batch vs.
sequential processing strategies. It is shown that the batch processing
techniques improve performance characteristics of GNSS signal tracking
for a number of application areas. Particularly, flight test results
presented demonstrate that batch processing improves the GPS tracking
margin by 8 dB as compared to sequential tracking for the deep GPS/INS
integration mode that performs code and carrier phase tracking, and
data bit recovery.},
added-at = {2011-05-30T10:41:10.000+0200},
author = {{Van Graas}, F. and Soloviev, A. and {Uijt de Haag}, M. and Gunawardena, S. and Braasch, M.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/289e466e39954a4af668df474dbacfd29/bmuth},
groups = {private},
interhash = {f3f10515c3a3e6f9719641edbe64ce8c},
intrahash = {89e466e39954a4af668df474dbacfd29},
journal = {Proc. of the 18th ION GNSS Conf.},
keywords = {GPS, batchProcessing, satnav sequentialProcessing, softwareReceiver},
owner = {bmuth},
pages = {200-211},
timestamp = {2014-08-11T22:37:44.000+0200},
title = {{Comparison of Two Approaches for GNSS Receiver Algorithms: Batch
Processing and Sequential Processing Considerations}},
username = {bmuth},
year = 2005
}