%0 Journal Article %1 MustefaJibril12020c %A Mustefa Jibril 1, Eliyas Alemayehu Tadese 2 Messay Tadese 3 %D 2020 %J Report and Opinion Journal %K /H∞ 2 H Steam condenser, control control, mixed optimal placement pole regional with %N 5 %P 15-20 %R 10.7537/marsroj120520.03 %T Comparison of Mixed H 2 /H∞ with Regional Pole Placement Control and H 2 Optimal Control for the Design of Steam Condenser %V 12 %X This paper investigates the comparison between mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement control and H 2 optimal control for the design of steam condenser. The comparison have been made for a step change in the steam condenser pressure set point for a step change of 10 & 23 seconds using MATLAB/Simulink environment for the steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller, steam condenser with H 2 optimal controller and steam condenser without controller. The steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller presented excellent and superior dynamic performance in response to the two step changes and an improvement in settling time. The overall simulation results demonstrated that the steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller can be an efficient alternative to the steam condenser with H 2 optimal controller for the steam condenser.

@article{MustefaJibril12020c, abstract = {This paper investigates the comparison between mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement control and H 2 optimal control for the design of steam condenser. The comparison have been made for a step change in the steam condenser pressure set point for a step change of 10 & 23 seconds using MATLAB/Simulink environment for the steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller, steam condenser with H 2 optimal controller and steam condenser without controller. The steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller presented excellent and superior dynamic performance in response to the two step changes and an improvement in settling time. The overall simulation results demonstrated that the steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller can be an efficient alternative to the steam condenser with H 2 optimal controller for the steam condenser.}, added-at = {2020-09-01T13:57:51.000+0200}, author = {Mustefa Jibril 1, Eliyas Alemayehu Tadese 2 Messay Tadese 3}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2caf6bc7a45ccec8a86519ce417cd730d/mustefa1981}, doi = {10.7537/marsroj120520.03}, file = {:C\:\\Users\\user\\Desktop\\NEW JOURNAL FOR ORCID\\Comparison of Mixed H 2 H∞ with Regional Pole Placement Control and H 2 Optimal C.pdf:PDF}, interhash = {faab919530b2c4f236d89b37a62c2a1d}, intrahash = {caf6bc7a45ccec8a86519ce417cd730d}, journal = {Report and Opinion Journal}, keywords = {/H∞ 2 H Steam condenser, control control, mixed optimal placement pole regional with}, month = May, number = 5, owner = {user}, pages = {15-20}, review = {peer reviwed}, timestamp = {2020-09-01T13:58:22.000+0200}, title = {Comparison of Mixed H 2 /H∞ with Regional Pole Placement Control and H 2 Optimal Control for the Design of Steam Condenser}, volume = 12, year = 2020 }