M. Tegmark. (1997)cite arxiv:gr-qc/9702052Comment: Minor modifications to match published version. 5 pages. Color figures and related links at http://www.sns.ias.edu/~max/dimensions.html (faster from the US), from http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~max/dimensions.html (faster from Europe) or from max@ias.edu.
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/14/4/002
Abstract
Some superstring theories have more than one effective low-energy limit,
corresponding to classical spacetimes with different dimensionalities. We argue
that all but the 3+1-dimensional one might correspond to ``dead worlds'',
devoid of observers, in which case all such ensemble theories would actually
predict that we should find ourselves inhabiting a 3+1-dimensional spacetime.
With more or less than one time-dimension, the partial differential equations
of nature would lack the hyperbolicity property that enables observers to make
predictions. In a space with more than three dimensions, there can be no
traditional atoms and perhaps no stable structures. A space with less than
three dimensions allows no gravitational force and may be too simple and barren
to contain observers.
cite arxiv:gr-qc/9702052Comment: Minor modifications to match published version. 5 pages. Color figures and related links at http://www.sns.ias.edu/~max/dimensions.html (faster from the US), from http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~max/dimensions.html (faster from Europe) or from max@ias.edu
%0 Generic
%1 tegmark1997dimensionality
%A Tegmark, Max
%D 1997
%K dimensionality mathematics spacetime
%R 10.1088/0264-9381/14/4/002
%T On the dimensionality of spacetime
%U http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9702052
%X Some superstring theories have more than one effective low-energy limit,
corresponding to classical spacetimes with different dimensionalities. We argue
that all but the 3+1-dimensional one might correspond to ``dead worlds'',
devoid of observers, in which case all such ensemble theories would actually
predict that we should find ourselves inhabiting a 3+1-dimensional spacetime.
With more or less than one time-dimension, the partial differential equations
of nature would lack the hyperbolicity property that enables observers to make
predictions. In a space with more than three dimensions, there can be no
traditional atoms and perhaps no stable structures. A space with less than
three dimensions allows no gravitational force and may be too simple and barren
to contain observers.
@misc{tegmark1997dimensionality,
abstract = {Some superstring theories have more than one effective low-energy limit,
corresponding to classical spacetimes with different dimensionalities. We argue
that all but the 3+1-dimensional one might correspond to ``dead worlds'',
devoid of observers, in which case all such ensemble theories would actually
predict that we should find ourselves inhabiting a 3+1-dimensional spacetime.
With more or less than one time-dimension, the partial differential equations
of nature would lack the hyperbolicity property that enables observers to make
predictions. In a space with more than three dimensions, there can be no
traditional atoms and perhaps no stable structures. A space with less than
three dimensions allows no gravitational force and may be too simple and barren
to contain observers.},
added-at = {2013-12-23T11:20:50.000+0100},
author = {Tegmark, Max},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/202ab17216fed861f33aac463be447049/aeu_research},
description = {On the dimensionality of spacetime},
doi = {10.1088/0264-9381/14/4/002},
interhash = {8b57ce2e305c7b9df6d34ca263df5f76},
intrahash = {02ab17216fed861f33aac463be447049},
keywords = {dimensionality mathematics spacetime},
note = {cite arxiv:gr-qc/9702052Comment: Minor modifications to match published version. 5 pages. Color figures and related links at http://www.sns.ias.edu/~max/dimensions.html (faster from the US), from http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~max/dimensions.html (faster from Europe) or from max@ias.edu},
timestamp = {2013-12-23T11:20:50.000+0100},
title = {On the dimensionality of spacetime},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9702052},
year = 1997
}