%0 Journal Article %1 citeulike:6703441 %A Coslett, H. %A Shenton, J. %A Dyer, T. %A Wiener, M. %D 2009 %J Brain Research %K timing %P 38--48 %R 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.015 %T Cognitive timing: Neuropsychology and anatomic basis %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.015 %V 1254 %X We report data from 31 subjects with focal hemisphere lesions (15 left hemisphere) as well as 16 normal controls on a battery of tasks assessing the estimation, production and reproduction of time intervals ranging from 2–12 s. Both visual and auditory stimuli were employed for the estimation and production tasks. First, ANOVAs were performed to assess the effect of stimulus modality on estimation and production tasks; a significant effect of stimulus modality was observed for the production but not the estimation task. Second, accuracy was significantly different for the 2 s interval as compared to longer intervals. Subsequent analyses of the data from 4–12 s stimuli demonstrated that patients with brain lesions were more variable than controls on the estimation and reproduction tasks. Additionally, patients with brain lesions but not controls exhibited significant differences in performance on the different tasks; patients with brain lesions under-produced but over-estimated time intervals of 4–12 s but performed relatively well on the reproduction task, a pattern of performance consistent with a ” fast clock”. There was a significant correlation between impaired performance and lesions of the parietal lobe but there was no effect of laterality of lesion or correlation between lateral frontal lobe lesions and impairment on any task.

@article{citeulike:6703441, abstract = {We report data from 31 subjects with focal hemisphere lesions (15 left hemisphere) as well as 16 normal controls on a battery of tasks assessing the estimation, production and reproduction of time intervals ranging from 2–12 s. Both visual and auditory stimuli were employed for the estimation and production tasks. First, ANOVAs were performed to assess the effect of stimulus modality on estimation and production tasks; a significant effect of stimulus modality was observed for the production but not the estimation task. Second, accuracy was significantly different for the 2 s interval as compared to longer intervals. Subsequent analyses of the data from 4–12 s stimuli demonstrated that patients with brain lesions were more variable than controls on the estimation and reproduction tasks. Additionally, patients with brain lesions but not controls exhibited significant differences in performance on the different tasks; patients with brain lesions under-produced but over-estimated time intervals of 4–12 s but performed relatively well on the reproduction task, a pattern of performance consistent with a ” fast clock”. There was a significant correlation between impaired performance and lesions of the parietal lobe but there was no effect of laterality of lesion or correlation between lateral frontal lobe lesions and impairment on any task.}, added-at = {2012-02-26T12:35:47.000+0100}, author = {Coslett, H. and Shenton, J. and Dyer, T. and Wiener, M.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20678f81ed8ea1509eba23614223c3596/jakspa}, citeulike-article-id = {6703441}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.015}, day = 13, doi = {10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.015}, interhash = {9ec43c6b659ffc2c37ba07d5a919cb51}, intrahash = {0678f81ed8ea1509eba23614223c3596}, issn = {00068993}, journal = {Brain Research}, keywords = {timing}, month = feb, pages = {38--48}, posted-at = {2012-02-24 18:47:23}, priority = {2}, timestamp = {2012-02-26T12:35:50.000+0100}, title = {Cognitive timing: Neuropsychology and anatomic basis}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.015}, volume = 1254, year = 2009 }