I. Lu, и M. Mantei. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work, стр. 97-112. Springer, (1991)Setting: Supported Process: Design Process in small teams (distributed)
=> Sketching is important for design processses => Group sketching
with shared drawing tools
Fokus: Idea Management in shared drawing tools.
Motivation: No own empirical results. Argumentation is based on results
of other studies that characterize the design process as chaotic
=> need for management.
Goal: Architecture for idea management in shared drawing tools
Methodical Approach: Research Studies on Group Design Activities and
Design Methodology => Collect Group Behavior Data => Study and Understand
to generate a taxonomy of group idea management processes => Derive
user Requiremets for supporting group idea management => Develop
architecture (CaveDraw)
Results: - Taxonomy of group idea management processes (list of recurring
process patterns): * Agree and add on the suggested idea * Agree
and subdivide the suggested idea * Modify the suggested idea * Scratch
and restart * Agree and wait * Compare and consolidate * Deprivatize
design ideas
- CaveDraw shared drawing package - Layer-based - All users can work
on different layers on the same time. - Pointer to point on items
- Definition of five critical factors for idea management (argumentation
unknown): * Work Allocation: split between individual and group,
personal design space? * Design Integration: how can data from the
personal space be integrated * Design Ownership: * Design Recall:
Undo-possibilites, versioning * Space Sharing: amount of workspace
is limited, if a big group acts on the workspace, the space can quickly
be full. - User Requirements drawn from taxonomy:
- Drawing of user requirements from each of the critical factors perspectives
- Argumentation that a layer based-approach satisfies the user requirements..
Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work
год
1991
страницы
97-112
издательство
Springer
timestamp
2010.03.05
file
LuMa91-IMi.pdf:LuMa91-IMi.pdf:PDF
owner
loser
Примечание
Setting: Supported Process: Design Process in small teams (distributed)
=> Sketching is important for design processses => Group sketching
with shared drawing tools
Fokus: Idea Management in shared drawing tools.
Motivation: No own empirical results. Argumentation is based on results
of other studies that characterize the design process as chaotic
=> need for management.
Goal: Architecture for idea management in shared drawing tools
Methodical Approach: Research Studies on Group Design Activities and
Design Methodology => Collect Group Behavior Data => Study and Understand
to generate a taxonomy of group idea management processes => Derive
user Requiremets for supporting group idea management => Develop
architecture (CaveDraw)
Results: - Taxonomy of group idea management processes (list of recurring
process patterns): * Agree and add on the suggested idea * Agree
and subdivide the suggested idea * Modify the suggested idea * Scratch
and restart * Agree and wait * Compare and consolidate * Deprivatize
design ideas
- CaveDraw shared drawing package - Layer-based - All users can work
on different layers on the same time. - Pointer to point on items
- Definition of five critical factors for idea management (argumentation
unknown): * Work Allocation: split between individual and group,
personal design space? * Design Integration: how can data from the
personal space be integrated * Design Ownership: * Design Recall:
Undo-possibilites, versioning * Space Sharing: amount of workspace
is limited, if a big group acts on the workspace, the space can quickly
be full. - User Requirements drawn from taxonomy:
- Drawing of user requirements from each of the critical factors perspectives
- Argumentation that a layer based-approach satisfies the user requirements.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 LuMa91-IMi
%A Lu, Iva M.
%A Mantei, Marilyn M.
%B Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work
%D 1991
%E Bannon, L.
%E Robinson, M.
%E Schmidt, K.
%I Springer
%K colaboration conference:ECSCW_1991 interaction modlab processed
%P 97-112
%T Idea Management in a Shared Drawing Tool
@inproceedings{LuMa91-IMi,
added-at = {2010-03-05T16:38:36.000+0100},
author = {Lu, Iva M. and Mantei, Marilyn M.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2097634eecb7506bd44422fe5f7071f96/kuloser},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work},
editor = {Bannon, L. and Robinson, M. and Schmidt, K.},
file = {LuMa91-IMi.pdf:LuMa91-IMi.pdf:PDF},
interhash = {cc72d152631d2362a52b525844975d7d},
intrahash = {097634eecb7506bd44422fe5f7071f96},
keywords = {colaboration conference:ECSCW_1991 interaction modlab processed},
note = {Setting: Supported Process: Design Process in small teams (distributed)
=> Sketching is important for design processses => Group sketching
with shared drawing tools
Fokus: Idea Management in shared drawing tools.
Motivation: No own empirical results. Argumentation is based on results
of other studies that characterize the design process as chaotic
=> need for management.
Goal: Architecture for idea management in shared drawing tools
Methodical Approach: Research Studies on Group Design Activities and
Design Methodology => Collect Group Behavior Data => Study and Understand
to generate a taxonomy of group idea management processes => Derive
user Requiremets for supporting group idea management => Develop
architecture (CaveDraw)
Results: - Taxonomy of group idea management processes (list of recurring
process patterns): * Agree and add on the suggested idea * Agree
and subdivide the suggested idea * Modify the suggested idea * Scratch
and restart * Agree and wait * Compare and consolidate * Deprivatize
design ideas
- CaveDraw shared drawing package - Layer-based - All users can work
on different layers on the same time. - Pointer to point on items
- Definition of five critical factors for idea management (argumentation
unknown): * Work Allocation: split between individual and group,
personal design space? * Design Integration: how can data from the
personal space be integrated * Design Ownership: * Design Recall:
Undo-possibilites, versioning * Space Sharing: amount of workspace
is limited, if a big group acts on the workspace, the space can quickly
be full. - User Requirements drawn from taxonomy:
- Drawing of user requirements from each of the critical factors perspectives
- Argumentation that a layer based-approach satisfies the user requirements.
},
owner = {loser},
pages = {97-112},
publisher = {Springer},
timestamp = {2010-03-05T16:38:37.000+0100},
title = {Idea Management in a Shared Drawing Tool},
year = 1991
}