We are witnessing a tremendous hype on the Internet of Things paradigm, with not only research projects, but also commercial products claiming to implement its fundamental mechanisms. Smart-connected-objects designers often have to face decisions on the global architecture of the service, since no single solution is valid for all the cases. In this paper, we explore the different criteria for designing architectures for Internet of Things solutions, along with illustrative examples of prototypes that implement these approaches.
PerCom 2010 Workshops: Proceedings of the 8th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, Mannheim, Germany
%0 Conference Paper
%1 VazquezRuizdeGaribayEtAl10PERCOM
%A Vazquez, Juan Ignacio
%A Ruiz-de Garibay, Jonathan
%A Eguiluz, Xabier
%A Doamo, Iker
%A Rentería, Silvia
%A Ayerbe, Ana
%B PerCom 2010 Workshops: Proceedings of the 8th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, Mannheim, Germany
%D 2010
%K v1205 ieee paper embedded ai device network application architecture zzz.spm zzz.a.spm14
%P 684-689
%R 10.1109/PERCOMW.2010.5470521
%T Communication Architectures and Experiences for Web-Connected Physical Smart Objects
%X We are witnessing a tremendous hype on the Internet of Things paradigm, with not only research projects, but also commercial products claiming to implement its fundamental mechanisms. Smart-connected-objects designers often have to face decisions on the global architecture of the service, since no single solution is valid for all the cases. In this paper, we explore the different criteria for designing architectures for Internet of Things solutions, along with illustrative examples of prototypes that implement these approaches.
%@ 978-1-4244-6605-4
@inproceedings{VazquezRuizdeGaribayEtAl10PERCOM,
abstract = {We are witnessing a tremendous hype on the Internet of Things paradigm, with not only research projects, but also commercial products claiming to implement its fundamental mechanisms. Smart-connected-objects designers often have to face decisions on the global architecture of the service, since no single solution is valid for all the cases. In this paper, we explore the different criteria for designing architectures for Internet of Things solutions, along with illustrative examples of prototypes that implement these approaches.},
added-at = {2012-05-30T10:55:26.000+0200},
author = {Vazquez, Juan Ignacio and Ruiz-de Garibay, Jonathan and Eguiluz, Xabier and Doamo, Iker and Rentería, Silvia and Ayerbe, Ana},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/209779fdbaf28df12ba082ddb2103f404/flint63},
booktitle = {PerCom 2010 Workshops: Proceedings of the 8th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, Mannheim, Germany},
doi = {10.1109/PERCOMW.2010.5470521},
file = {Preprint:2010/VazquezRuizdeGaribayEtAl10PERCOM.pdf:PDF},
groups = {public},
interhash = {8b1ed64649e6bc8043c6ecfbfc0d0dde},
intrahash = {09779fdbaf28df12ba082ddb2103f404},
isbn = {978-1-4244-6605-4},
keywords = {v1205 ieee paper embedded ai device network application architecture zzz.spm zzz.a.spm14},
pages = {684-689},
timestamp = {2018-04-16T11:46:16.000+0200},
title = {Communication Architectures and Experiences for Web-Connected Physical Smart Objects},
username = {flint63},
year = 2010
}