The paper "Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey"
1 proposes a new, much shorter, version of the CLASS based on standard factor
analysis. In this comment we explain why we believe the analysis that is used
is inappropriate, and the proposed modified CLASS will be measuring something
quite different, and less useful, than the original. The CLASS was based on
extensive interviews with students and is intended to be a formative
measurement of instruction that is probing a much more complex construct and
with different goals than what is handled with classic psychometrics. We are
writing this comment to reiterate the value of combining techniques of
cognitive science with statistical analyses as described in detail in Adams &
Wieman, 2011 2 when developing a test of expert-like thinking for use in
formative assessment. This type of approach is also called for by the National
Research Council in a recent report 3.
%0 Generic
%1 Wieman2015Proper
%A Wieman, Carl E.
%A Adams, Wendy K.
%D 2015
%K teaching
%T On the Proper Use of Statistical Analyses; a Comment on "Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey" by Douglas et al
%U http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03257
%X The paper "Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey"
1 proposes a new, much shorter, version of the CLASS based on standard factor
analysis. In this comment we explain why we believe the analysis that is used
is inappropriate, and the proposed modified CLASS will be measuring something
quite different, and less useful, than the original. The CLASS was based on
extensive interviews with students and is intended to be a formative
measurement of instruction that is probing a much more complex construct and
with different goals than what is handled with classic psychometrics. We are
writing this comment to reiterate the value of combining techniques of
cognitive science with statistical analyses as described in detail in Adams &
Wieman, 2011 2 when developing a test of expert-like thinking for use in
formative assessment. This type of approach is also called for by the National
Research Council in a recent report 3.
@misc{Wieman2015Proper,
abstract = {{The paper "Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey"
[1] proposes a new, much shorter, version of the CLASS based on standard factor
analysis. In this comment we explain why we believe the analysis that is used
is inappropriate, and the proposed modified CLASS will be measuring something
quite different, and less useful, than the original. The CLASS was based on
extensive interviews with students and is intended to be a formative
measurement of instruction that is probing a much more complex construct and
with different goals than what is handled with classic psychometrics. We are
writing this comment to reiterate the value of combining techniques of
cognitive science with statistical analyses as described in detail in Adams \&
Wieman, 2011 [2] when developing a test of expert-like thinking for use in
formative assessment. This type of approach is also called for by the National
Research Council in a recent report [3].}},
added-at = {2019-02-23T22:09:48.000+0100},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
author = {Wieman, Carl E. and Adams, Wendy K.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2186f3b89a9dc38a0934982f2bac20631/cmcneile},
citeulike-article-id = {13492361},
citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03257},
citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.03257},
day = 14,
eprint = {1501.03257},
interhash = {a6809a01b77f1bd44130b47eba144253},
intrahash = {186f3b89a9dc38a0934982f2bac20631},
keywords = {teaching},
month = jan,
posted-at = {2015-01-15 09:13:15},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2019-02-23T22:15:27.000+0100},
title = {{On the Proper Use of Statistical Analyses; a Comment on "Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey" by Douglas et al}},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03257},
year = 2015
}