In Exp I, 120 college Ss aged 17-57 yrs performed 1 of 2 tasks (a
listening or a cancellation task) within 1 of 3 auditory environments
(continuous noise, intermittent noise, quiet). Aftereffects of noise
on performance similar to those found by D. C. Glass and J. E. Singer
(1972) were not obtained. Ss reported greater annoyance with noise
when they worked on the listening task (with which the noise interfered)
than when they worked on a routine cancellation task (with which
the noise did not interfere). Exp II (48 Ss) was designed to replicate
more closely Glass and Singer's procedures but produced essentially
the same results as Exp I. Possible explanations for the absence
of aftereffects are discussed. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)
Annoyance and behavioral aftereffects following interfering and noninterfering aircraft noise.PDF:1970s\\Annoyance and behavioral aftereffects following interfering and noninterfering aircraft noise.PDF:PDF
%0 Journal Article
%1 Moran1977
%A Moran, Sharon L.
%A Rensselaer, Michel Loeb
%D 1977
%J Journal of Applied Psychology
%K & 17-57 aftereffects, aircraft annoyance behavioral cancellation during interfering listening noise noninterfering olds routine task, vs yr
%P 719-726
%T Annoyance and behavioral aftereffects following interfering and noninterfering
aircraft noise
%V 62
%X In Exp I, 120 college Ss aged 17-57 yrs performed 1 of 2 tasks (a
listening or a cancellation task) within 1 of 3 auditory environments
(continuous noise, intermittent noise, quiet). Aftereffects of noise
on performance similar to those found by D. C. Glass and J. E. Singer
(1972) were not obtained. Ss reported greater annoyance with noise
when they worked on the listening task (with which the noise interfered)
than when they worked on a routine cancellation task (with which
the noise did not interfere). Exp II (48 Ss) was designed to replicate
more closely Glass and Singer's procedures but produced essentially
the same results as Exp I. Possible explanations for the absence
of aftereffects are discussed. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)
@article{Moran1977,
abstract = {In Exp I, 120 college Ss aged 17-57 yrs performed 1 of 2 tasks (a
listening or a cancellation task) within 1 of 3 auditory environments
(continuous noise, intermittent noise, quiet). Aftereffects of noise
on performance similar to those found by D. C. Glass and J. E. Singer
(1972) were not obtained. Ss reported greater annoyance with noise
when they worked on the listening task (with which the noise interfered)
than when they worked on a routine cancellation task (with which
the noise did not interfere). Exp II (48 Ss) was designed to replicate
more closely Glass and Singer's procedures but produced essentially
the same results as Exp I. Possible explanations for the absence
of aftereffects are discussed. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)},
added-at = {2012-01-27T14:10:42.000+0100},
author = {Moran, Sharon L. and Rensselaer, Michel Loeb},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2188f4a3ad54cc906ca02d1cd36090ddb/muhe},
file = {Annoyance and behavioral aftereffects following interfering and noninterfering aircraft noise.PDF:1970s\\Annoyance and behavioral aftereffects following interfering and noninterfering aircraft noise.PDF:PDF},
interhash = {bb21335988ef841d6deafabc9904e7c3},
intrahash = {188f4a3ad54cc906ca02d1cd36090ddb},
journal = {Journal of Applied Psychology},
keywords = {& 17-57 aftereffects, aircraft annoyance behavioral cancellation during interfering listening noise noninterfering olds routine task, vs yr},
owner = {Mu},
pages = {719-726},
timestamp = {2012-01-27T14:11:02.000+0100},
title = {Annoyance and behavioral aftereffects following interfering and noninterfering
aircraft noise},
volume = 62,
year = 1977
}