The investigation of time-of-day effects on cognitive performance began in the early days of psychophysiological performance assessments. Since then, standardised, highly controlled protocols (constant routine and forced desynchrony) and a standard performance task (psychomotor vigilance task) have been developed to quantify sleep-wake homeostatic and internal circadian time-dependent effects on human cognitive performance. However, performance assessment in this field depends on a plethora of factors. The roles of task difficulty, task duration and complexity, the performance measure per se, practice effects, inter-individual differences, and ageing are all relevant aspects. Therefore, well-defined theoretical approaches and standard procedures are needed for tasks pinpointing higher cortical functions along with more information about time-dependent changes in the neural basis of task performance. This promises a fascinating challenge for future research on sleep-wake related and circadian aspects of different cognitive domains.
%0 Journal Article
%1 citeulike:1202699
%A Blatter, Katharina
%A Cajochen, Christian
%B Includes a Special Section on Chronobiology Aspects of the Sleep--Wake Cycle and Thermoreregulation
%D 2007
%J Physiology & Behavior
%K chronobiology
%N 2-3
%P 196--208
%R 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.009
%T Circadian rhythms in cognitive performance: Methodological constraints, protocols, theoretical underpinnings
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.009
%V 90
%X The investigation of time-of-day effects on cognitive performance began in the early days of psychophysiological performance assessments. Since then, standardised, highly controlled protocols (constant routine and forced desynchrony) and a standard performance task (psychomotor vigilance task) have been developed to quantify sleep-wake homeostatic and internal circadian time-dependent effects on human cognitive performance. However, performance assessment in this field depends on a plethora of factors. The roles of task difficulty, task duration and complexity, the performance measure per se, practice effects, inter-individual differences, and ageing are all relevant aspects. Therefore, well-defined theoretical approaches and standard procedures are needed for tasks pinpointing higher cortical functions along with more information about time-dependent changes in the neural basis of task performance. This promises a fascinating challenge for future research on sleep-wake related and circadian aspects of different cognitive domains.
@article{citeulike:1202699,
abstract = {The investigation of time-of-day effects on cognitive performance began in the early days of psychophysiological performance assessments. Since then, standardised, highly controlled protocols (constant routine and forced desynchrony) and a standard performance task (psychomotor vigilance task) have been developed to quantify sleep-wake homeostatic and internal circadian time-dependent effects on human cognitive performance. However, performance assessment in this field depends on a plethora of factors. The roles of task difficulty, task duration and complexity, the performance measure per se, practice effects, inter-individual differences, and ageing are all relevant aspects. Therefore, well-defined theoretical approaches and standard procedures are needed for tasks pinpointing higher cortical functions along with more information about time-dependent changes in the neural basis of task performance. This promises a fascinating challenge for future research on sleep-wake related and circadian aspects of different cognitive domains.},
added-at = {2012-02-26T12:35:47.000+0100},
author = {Blatter, Katharina and Cajochen, Christian},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2226be53d2d05bffd1b9433db5d5c97c2/jakspa},
booktitle = {Includes a Special Section on Chronobiology Aspects of the Sleep--Wake Cycle and Thermoreregulation},
citeulike-article-id = {1202699},
citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.009},
citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17055007},
citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17055007},
citeulike-linkout-3 = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0P-4M51FHT-2/2/39fd6febc4b967df255695cc499a872b},
day = 28,
doi = {10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.009},
interhash = {a0ae57e5b9c3a394dfc3e3ca76bf794f},
intrahash = {226be53d2d05bffd1b9433db5d5c97c2},
journal = {Physiology \& Behavior},
keywords = {chronobiology},
month = feb,
number = {2-3},
pages = {196--208},
pmid = {17055007},
posted-at = {2012-02-24 19:18:09},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2012-02-26T12:35:49.000+0100},
title = {Circadian rhythms in cognitive performance: Methodological constraints, protocols, theoretical underpinnings},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.009},
volume = 90,
year = 2007
}