PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ergonomic and environmental variations on indoor shuttle run (SR) performance in wheelchair sportsmen. METHODS: Eleven experienced male wheelchair sportsmen performed three 25-m SRs in random order with varying turning capacity (TC) and mechanical resistance (MR): condition NN where participants used their sports wheelchair on a tartan surface, condition RN with increased MR, and condition RD with limited TC. Metabolic data were continuously recorded using a portable K4b(2) system. RESULTS: Friedman ANOVA with Wilcoxon a posteriori testing indicated similar VO(2peak) values in all three tests. SR performance, however, was significantly different across the three test conditions (NN: 536.18 +/-119.09 s; RN: 488.82+/-119.84 s; RD: 404.91+/-88.41 s). SR performance contributed for 28\% of the explained variance of the measured VO(2peak). The addition of TC or MR or both increased the explained variance to 32, 38 and 41\%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a significant impact of variations in floor surface and wheelchair-user interface on SR performance. The findings also suggest that strong reservations have to be made regarding the validity of a SR test, as predictor of VO(2peak) in a wheelchair user population.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Vanlandewijck2006
%A Vanlandewijck, Yves
%A van de Vliet, Peter
%A Verellen, Joeri
%A Theisen, Daniel
%D 2006
%J Disabil Rehabil
%K Adult; Cerebral Palsy; Humans; Male; Oxygen Consumption; Physical Fitness; Spinal Cord Injuries; Task Performance and Analysis; Wheelchairs
%N 20
%P 1259--1266
%T Determinants of shuttle run performance in the prediction of peak VO2 in wheelchair users.
%V 28
%X PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ergonomic and environmental variations on indoor shuttle run (SR) performance in wheelchair sportsmen. METHODS: Eleven experienced male wheelchair sportsmen performed three 25-m SRs in random order with varying turning capacity (TC) and mechanical resistance (MR): condition NN where participants used their sports wheelchair on a tartan surface, condition RN with increased MR, and condition RD with limited TC. Metabolic data were continuously recorded using a portable K4b(2) system. RESULTS: Friedman ANOVA with Wilcoxon a posteriori testing indicated similar VO(2peak) values in all three tests. SR performance, however, was significantly different across the three test conditions (NN: 536.18 +/-119.09 s; RN: 488.82+/-119.84 s; RD: 404.91+/-88.41 s). SR performance contributed for 28\% of the explained variance of the measured VO(2peak). The addition of TC or MR or both increased the explained variance to 32, 38 and 41\%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a significant impact of variations in floor surface and wheelchair-user interface on SR performance. The findings also suggest that strong reservations have to be made regarding the validity of a SR test, as predictor of VO(2peak) in a wheelchair user population.
@article{Vanlandewijck2006,
abstract = {PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ergonomic and environmental variations on indoor shuttle run (SR) performance in wheelchair sportsmen. METHODS: Eleven experienced male wheelchair sportsmen performed three 25-m SRs in random order with varying turning capacity (TC) and mechanical resistance (MR): condition NN where participants used their sports wheelchair on a tartan surface, condition RN with increased MR, and condition RD with limited TC. Metabolic data were continuously recorded using a portable K4b(2) system. RESULTS: Friedman ANOVA with Wilcoxon a posteriori testing indicated similar VO(2peak) values in all three tests. SR performance, however, was significantly different across the three test conditions (NN: 536.18 +/-119.09 s; RN: 488.82+/-119.84 s; RD: 404.91+/-88.41 s). SR performance contributed for 28\% of the explained variance of the measured VO(2peak). The addition of TC or MR or both increased the explained variance to 32, 38 and 41\%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a significant impact of variations in floor surface and wheelchair-user interface on SR performance. The findings also suggest that strong reservations have to be made regarding the validity of a SR test, as predictor of VO(2peak) in a wheelchair user population.},
added-at = {2014-07-19T21:50:44.000+0200},
author = {Vanlandewijck, Yves and van de Vliet, Peter and Verellen, Joeri and Theisen, Daniel},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2245dca003a4369f26ae06aaae3251f1b/ar0berts},
groups = {public},
interhash = {ca5b03f4e49a0decab7ea6ba2d83345b},
intrahash = {245dca003a4369f26ae06aaae3251f1b},
journal = {Disabil Rehabil},
keywords = {Adult; Cerebral Palsy; Humans; Male; Oxygen Consumption; Physical Fitness; Spinal Cord Injuries; Task Performance and Analysis; Wheelchairs},
month = Oct,
number = 20,
pages = {1259--1266},
pmid = {17083172},
timestamp = {2014-07-19T21:50:44.000+0200},
title = {Determinants of shuttle run performance in the prediction of peak VO2 in wheelchair users.},
username = {ar0berts},
volume = 28,
year = 2006
}