K. Petrovay. (2019)cite arxiv:1907.02107Comment: 90+ pages, 14 figures. Revised edition of 2010 living review arXiv:1012.5513; currently under review.
Аннотация
A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given,
including early forecasts for cycle 25. The review focuses on those aspects of
the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The
scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the
amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than
right after the start of the given cycle.
In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles,
precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. One
method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the
past few solar cycles is the polar field precursor. Nevertheless, some
extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts
are quickly coming into their own, and, despite not having a long proven
record, their predictions are received with increasing confidence by the
community.
%0 Generic
%1 petrovay2019solar
%A Petrovay, Kristof
%D 2019
%K cycle prediction solar
%T Solar cycle prediction
%U http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02107
%X A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given,
including early forecasts for cycle 25. The review focuses on those aspects of
the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The
scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the
amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than
right after the start of the given cycle.
In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles,
precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. One
method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the
past few solar cycles is the polar field precursor. Nevertheless, some
extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts
are quickly coming into their own, and, despite not having a long proven
record, their predictions are received with increasing confidence by the
community.
@misc{petrovay2019solar,
abstract = {A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given,
including early forecasts for cycle 25. The review focuses on those aspects of
the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The
scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the
amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than
right after the start of the given cycle.
In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles,
precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. One
method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the
past few solar cycles is the polar field precursor. Nevertheless, some
extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts
are quickly coming into their own, and, despite not having a long proven
record, their predictions are received with increasing confidence by the
community.},
added-at = {2019-07-08T22:47:36.000+0200},
author = {Petrovay, Kristof},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/227260793a89684ac5c12e999d1a198e5/ericblackman},
description = {Solar cycle prediction},
interhash = {2cc76144cbda8bd91bc736c37cddc389},
intrahash = {27260793a89684ac5c12e999d1a198e5},
keywords = {cycle prediction solar},
note = {cite arxiv:1907.02107Comment: 90+ pages, 14 figures. Revised edition of 2010 living review arXiv:1012.5513; currently under review},
timestamp = {2019-07-08T22:47:36.000+0200},
title = {Solar cycle prediction},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02107},
year = 2019
}