The single-stimulus (SS) preference assessment procedure has been described as more appropriate than the paired stimulus (PS) procedure for “lower functioning” individuals, but this guideline’s vagueness limits its usefulness. We administered the SS and PS preference assessment procedures with food items to seven individuals with severe or profound developmental disabilities who scored at level 2 of the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) and seven who scored at ABLA level 3. Thirteen of the 14 participants also received these assessments (PS and SS), with non-food items. The two procedures were about equally effective for both groups, and with both types of stimuli, although the PS procedure produced more refined preference hierarchies. Most participants showed moderate to high correlations in preference scores between the two procedures for both food and non-food items. These results suggest that, for individuals who score at either ABLA level 2 or ABLA level 3, the SS and the PS procedures are equally likely to identify preferred stimuli.
%0 Journal Article
%1 thomczar2007
%A Thomson, K.M.
%A Czarnecki, D.
%A Martin, T.L.
%A Yu, C.T.
%A Martin, G.L.
%D 2007
%J Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities
%K abla cv developmental-disabilities pdfcopy preference-assessment publication
%N 1
%P 107--114
%T Predicting optimal preference assessment methods for individuals with developmental disabilities.
%V 42
%X The single-stimulus (SS) preference assessment procedure has been described as more appropriate than the paired stimulus (PS) procedure for “lower functioning” individuals, but this guideline’s vagueness limits its usefulness. We administered the SS and PS preference assessment procedures with food items to seven individuals with severe or profound developmental disabilities who scored at level 2 of the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) and seven who scored at ABLA level 3. Thirteen of the 14 participants also received these assessments (PS and SS), with non-food items. The two procedures were about equally effective for both groups, and with both types of stimuli, although the PS procedure produced more refined preference hierarchies. Most participants showed moderate to high correlations in preference scores between the two procedures for both food and non-food items. These results suggest that, for individuals who score at either ABLA level 2 or ABLA level 3, the SS and the PS procedures are equally likely to identify preferred stimuli.
@article{thomczar2007,
abstract = {The single-stimulus (SS) preference assessment procedure has been described as more appropriate than the paired stimulus (PS) procedure for “lower functioning” individuals, but this guideline’s vagueness limits its usefulness. We administered the SS and PS preference assessment procedures with food items to seven individuals with severe or profound developmental disabilities who scored at level 2 of the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) and seven who scored at ABLA level 3. Thirteen of the 14 participants also received these assessments (PS and SS), with non-food items. The two procedures were about equally effective for both groups, and with both types of stimuli, although the PS procedure produced more refined preference hierarchies. Most participants showed moderate to high correlations in preference scores between the two procedures for both food and non-food items. These results suggest that, for individuals who score at either ABLA level 2 or ABLA level 3, the SS and the PS procedures are equally likely to identify preferred stimuli.},
added-at = {2007-03-22T18:14:22.000+0100},
author = {Thomson, K.M. and Czarnecki, D. and Martin, T.L. and Yu, C.T. and Martin, G.L.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/229981605b355ffc81532aa572e106baa/toby},
interhash = {6b9558fb0f8a745612974e31ddbe79c4},
intrahash = {29981605b355ffc81532aa572e106baa},
journal = {Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities},
keywords = {abla cv developmental-disabilities pdfcopy preference-assessment publication},
month = {March},
number = 1,
pages = {107--114},
timestamp = {2009-04-23T17:14:36.000+0200},
title = {Predicting optimal preference assessment methods for individuals with developmental disabilities.},
volume = 42,
year = 2007
}