We analyze an evolutionary model with a finite number of players and
with noise or mutations. The expansion and contraction of strategies
is linked--as usual--to their current relative success, but mutations--which
perturb the system away from its deterministic evolution--are present
as well. Mutations can occur in every period, so the focus is on
the implications of ongoing mutations, not a one-shot mutation.
The effect of these mutations is to drastically reduce the set of
equilibria to what we term "long-run equilibria." For $2 \times
2$ symmetric games with two symmetric strict Nash equilibria the
equilibrium selected satisfies (for large populations) Harsanyi
and Selten's (1988) criterion of risk-dominance. In particular,
if both strategies have equal security levels, the Pareto dominant
Nash equilibrium is selected, even though there is another strict
Nash equilibrium.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Kandori1993
%A Kandori, Michihiro
%A Mailath, George J.
%A Rob, Rafael
%D 1993
%J Ecta
%K chains, risk Evolutionary Markov dominance, selection Equilibrium strict Game learning, theory, rationality,
%N 1
%P 29--56
%T Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games
%V 61
%X We analyze an evolutionary model with a finite number of players and
with noise or mutations. The expansion and contraction of strategies
is linked--as usual--to their current relative success, but mutations--which
perturb the system away from its deterministic evolution--are present
as well. Mutations can occur in every period, so the focus is on
the implications of ongoing mutations, not a one-shot mutation.
The effect of these mutations is to drastically reduce the set of
equilibria to what we term "long-run equilibria." For $2 \times
2$ symmetric games with two symmetric strict Nash equilibria the
equilibrium selected satisfies (for large populations) Harsanyi
and Selten's (1988) criterion of risk-dominance. In particular,
if both strategies have equal security levels, the Pareto dominant
Nash equilibrium is selected, even though there is another strict
Nash equilibrium.
@article{Kandori1993,
abstract = {We analyze an evolutionary model with a finite number of players and
with noise or mutations. The expansion and contraction of strategies
is linked--as usual--to their current relative success, but mutations--which
perturb the system away from its deterministic evolution--are present
as well. Mutations can occur in every period, so the focus is on
the implications of ongoing mutations, not a one-shot mutation.
The effect of these mutations is to drastically reduce the set of
equilibria to what we term "long-run equilibria." For $2 \times
2$ symmetric games with two symmetric strict Nash equilibria the
equilibrium selected satisfies (for large populations) Harsanyi
and Selten's (1988) criterion of risk-dominance. In particular,
if both strategies have equal security levels, the Pareto dominant
Nash equilibrium is selected, even though there is another strict
Nash equilibrium.},
added-at = {2006-09-29T17:08:21.000+0200},
author = {Kandori, Michihiro and Mailath, George J. and Rob, Rafael},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22fe443bb73c5a1e7aa6f76bf1b0806cd/gerhard},
copyright = {Copyright 1993 The Econometric Society},
interhash = {e7a7dbd92c8ad44b012ecbac00a39135},
intrahash = {2fe443bb73c5a1e7aa6f76bf1b0806cd},
issn = {00129682},
journal = {Ecta},
keywords = {chains, risk Evolutionary Markov dominance, selection Equilibrium strict Game learning, theory, rationality,},
month = {Jan.},
number = 1,
owner = {Gerhard},
pages = {29--56},
pdf = {papers\Kandori1993.pdf},
timestamp = {2006-09-29T17:08:21.000+0200},
title = {Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games},
volume = 61,
year = 1993
}