The scope of the present work was to assess and compare different
methods to determine molecular weight (MW) averages and molecular
weight distributions (MWD) of two samples of sodium alginate of different
composition. Weight average (MBAR(w)) and number average (MBAR(n))
molecular weights were determined by totally integrated laser light
scattering (LLS), both at wide angles (WA) and at a low angle (LA),
and membrane osmometry, respectively. The two alginates were fractionated
by preparative and analytical size exclusion chromatography. Absolute
molecular weight distribution curves were obtained from SEC, using
an on-line LA-LLS detector coupled with an RI concentration detector.
Relative MWD curves were determined from 'universal' calibration
of the SEC data. MBAR(w), MBAR(v), and MBAR(n) were calculated from
the 'universal' calibration curve and etaj values of the fractions.
Good correlation between molecular weight averages obtained from
the different methods was observed. Mark-Houwink-Sakurada parameters,
a and K, for the two different alginate samples have been determined.
%0 Journal Article
%1 MARTINSEN1991
%A MARTINSEN, A.
%A SKJAKBRAEK, G.
%A SMIDSROD, O.
%A ZANETTI, F.
%A PAOLETTI, S.
%C THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, OXON, ENGLAND OX5
1GB
%D 1991
%I ELSEVIER SCI LTD
%J Carbohydr. Polym.
%K ;; [ISI:] alginate light-scattering; sodium
%N 2
%P 171 -- 193
%T COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF MOLECULAR-WEIGHT
AND MOLECULAR-WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF ALGINATES
%V 15
%X The scope of the present work was to assess and compare different
methods to determine molecular weight (MW) averages and molecular
weight distributions (MWD) of two samples of sodium alginate of different
composition. Weight average (MBAR(w)) and number average (MBAR(n))
molecular weights were determined by totally integrated laser light
scattering (LLS), both at wide angles (WA) and at a low angle (LA),
and membrane osmometry, respectively. The two alginates were fractionated
by preparative and analytical size exclusion chromatography. Absolute
molecular weight distribution curves were obtained from SEC, using
an on-line LA-LLS detector coupled with an RI concentration detector.
Relative MWD curves were determined from 'universal' calibration
of the SEC data. MBAR(w), MBAR(v), and MBAR(n) were calculated from
the 'universal' calibration curve and etaj values of the fractions.
Good correlation between molecular weight averages obtained from
the different methods was observed. Mark-Houwink-Sakurada parameters,
a and K, for the two different alginate samples have been determined.
@article{MARTINSEN1991,
__markedentry = {[phpts:6]},
abstract = {The scope of the present work was to assess and compare different
methods to determine molecular weight (MW) averages and molecular
weight distributions (MWD) of two samples of sodium alginate of different
composition. Weight average (MBAR(w)) and number average (MBAR(n))
molecular weights were determined by totally integrated laser light
scattering (LLS), both at wide angles (WA) and at a low angle (LA),
and membrane osmometry, respectively. The two alginates were fractionated
by preparative and analytical size exclusion chromatography. Absolute
molecular weight distribution curves were obtained from SEC, using
an on-line LA-LLS detector coupled with an RI concentration detector.
Relative MWD curves were determined from 'universal' calibration
of the SEC data. MBAR(w), MBAR(v), and MBAR(n) were calculated from
the 'universal' calibration curve and [eta]j values of the fractions.
Good correlation between molecular weight averages obtained from
the different methods was observed. Mark-Houwink-Sakurada parameters,
a and K, for the two different alginate samples have been determined.},
added-at = {2011-11-04T13:47:04.000+0100},
address = {THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, OXON, ENGLAND OX5
1GB},
author = {MARTINSEN, A. and SKJAKBRAEK, G. and SMIDSROD, O. and ZANETTI, F. and PAOLETTI, S.},
authoraddress = {UNIV TRIESTE,DEPT BIOCHEM BIOPHYS & MACROMOLEC CHEM,P EUROPA 1,I-34127
TRIESTE,ITALY. ; NORWEGIAN INST TECHNOL,DIV BIOTECHNOL,NORWEGIAN
BIOPOLYMER LAB,N-7034 TRONDHEIM,NORWAY. ; POLY BIOS RES CTR,TECHNOL
BIOPOLYMERS LAB,I-34012 TRIESTE,ITALY.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23545836317783709672828ec463a3ff8/pawelsikorski},
citedref = {BALL A, 1988, INT J BIOL MACROMOL, V10, P259 ; DINGSOYR E, 1977, BRIT
POLYM J, V9, P56 ; DUBOIS M, 1956, ANAL CHEM, V28, P350 ; GRASDALEN
H, 1979, CARBOHYD RES, V68, P23 ; GRASDALEN H, 1983, CARBOHYD RES,
V118, P255 ; HARDING S, IN PRESS ADV CARBOHY, V1 ; HAUG A, 1959,
ACTA CHEM SCAND, V13, P1250 ; HAUG A, 1966, ACTA CHEM SCAND, V20,
P183 ; LIM F, 1980, SCIENCE, V210, P908 ; MACKIE W, 1980, BIOPOLYMERS,
V19, P1839 ; MAHN B, 1984, LSN113 LDC MILT ROY ; MARTINSEN A, 1989,
BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V33, P79 ; MCCONNELL ML, 1978, AM LAB, V10, P63
; SKJAKBRAEK G, 1989, CARBOHYD POLYM, V10, P31 ; SKJAKBRAEK G, 1990,
SEAWEED RESOURCES EU ; SMIDSROD O, 1968, ACTA CHEM SCAND, V22, P797
; STRAND KA, 1982, MACROMOLECULES, V15, P570 ; WEDLOCK DJ, 1986,
INT J BIOL MACROMOL, V8, P57},
interhash = {960d82f753b8eb8f2f12ee9ab6a79a73},
intrahash = {3545836317783709672828ec463a3ff8},
isifile-dt = {Article},
isifile-ga = {FG161},
isifile-j9 = {CARBOHYD POLYM},
isifile-nr = {18},
isifile-pi = {OXFORD},
isifile-sc = {Chemistry, Applied; Chemistry, Organic; Polymer Science},
isifile-tc = {66},
issn = {0144-8617},
journal = {Carbohydr. Polym.},
keywords = {;; [ISI:] alginate light-scattering; sodium},
language = {English},
number = 2,
owner = {phpts},
pages = {171 -- 193},
publisher = {ELSEVIER SCI LTD},
size = {23 p.},
sourceid = {ISI:A1991FG16100004},
timestamp = {2011-11-04T13:47:17.000+0100},
title = {COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF MOLECULAR-WEIGHT
AND MOLECULAR-WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF ALGINATES},
volume = 15,
year = 1991
}