In recent years, social Web sites have become important components of the Web. With their success, however, has come an increasing flux of spam. If left unchecked, spam threatens to undermine resource sharing, interactivity, and openness. The authors survey three categories of potential countermeasures: those based on detection, demotion, and prevention. Although many of these countermeasures have been proposed before for email and Web spam, the authors find that their applicability to social Web sites differs. How should we evaluate spam countermeasures for social Web sites, and what future challenges might we face?
%0 Journal Article
%1 heymann2007spam
%A Heymann, Paul
%A Koutrika, Georgia
%A Garcia-Molina, Hector
%C Piscataway, NJ, USA
%D 2007
%I IEEE Educational Activities Department
%J IEEE Internet Computing
%K social-networks spam survey tagging
%N 6
%P 36--45
%R http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2007.125
%T Fighting Spam on Social Web Sites: A Survey of Approaches and Future Challenges
%U http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1304062.1304547&coll=GUIDE&dl=
%V 11
%X In recent years, social Web sites have become important components of the Web. With their success, however, has come an increasing flux of spam. If left unchecked, spam threatens to undermine resource sharing, interactivity, and openness. The authors survey three categories of potential countermeasures: those based on detection, demotion, and prevention. Although many of these countermeasures have been proposed before for email and Web spam, the authors find that their applicability to social Web sites differs. How should we evaluate spam countermeasures for social Web sites, and what future challenges might we face?
@article{heymann2007spam,
abstract = {In recent years, social Web sites have become important components of the Web. With their success, however, has come an increasing flux of spam. If left unchecked, spam threatens to undermine resource sharing, interactivity, and openness. The authors survey three categories of potential countermeasures: those based on detection, demotion, and prevention. Although many of these countermeasures have been proposed before for email and Web spam, the authors find that their applicability to social Web sites differs. How should we evaluate spam countermeasures for social Web sites, and what future challenges might we face?},
added-at = {2008-02-29T08:37:30.000+0100},
address = {Piscataway, NJ, USA},
author = {Heymann, Paul and Koutrika, Georgia and Garcia-Molina, Hector},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23e0a8be9fb6fff102e6aed13d1db22f7/beate},
description = {Fighting Spam on Social Web Sites},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2007.125},
interhash = {dea5faea536678622993617bfc5fbb85},
intrahash = {3e0a8be9fb6fff102e6aed13d1db22f7},
issn = {1089-7801},
journal = {IEEE Internet Computing},
keywords = {social-networks spam survey tagging},
number = 6,
pages = {36--45},
publisher = {IEEE Educational Activities Department},
timestamp = {2010-09-21T10:15:54.000+0200},
title = {Fighting Spam on Social Web Sites: A Survey of Approaches and Future Challenges},
url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1304062.1304547&coll=GUIDE&dl=},
volume = 11,
year = 2007
}