We present an analysis of the temporal evolution of a
scientific coauthorship network, the genetic
programming network. We find evidence that the network
grows according to preferential attachment, with a
slightly sublinear rate. We empirically find how a
giant component forms and develops, and we characterise
the network by several other time-varying quantities:
the mean degree, the clustering coefficient, the
average path length, and the degree distribution. We
find that the first three statistics increase over time
in the growing network; the degree distribution tends
to stabilise toward an exponentially truncated
power-law. We finally suggest an effective network
interpretation that takes into account the aging of
collaboration relationships.
%0 Journal Article
%1 evol-gp-PhysA-final
%A Tomassini, Marco
%A Luthi, Leslie
%D 2007
%J Physica A
%K Network Preferential Scientific Social algorithms, attachment, collaboration, evolution, genetic networks programming,
%P 750--764
%T Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific
collaboration network
%V 385
%X We present an analysis of the temporal evolution of a
scientific coauthorship network, the genetic
programming network. We find evidence that the network
grows according to preferential attachment, with a
slightly sublinear rate. We empirically find how a
giant component forms and develops, and we characterise
the network by several other time-varying quantities:
the mean degree, the clustering coefficient, the
average path length, and the degree distribution. We
find that the first three statistics increase over time
in the growing network; the degree distribution tends
to stabilise toward an exponentially truncated
power-law. We finally suggest an effective network
interpretation that takes into account the aging of
collaboration relationships.
@article{evol-gp-PhysA-final,
abstract = {We present an analysis of the temporal evolution of a
scientific coauthorship network, the genetic
programming network. We find evidence that the network
grows according to preferential attachment, with a
slightly sublinear rate. We empirically find how a
giant component forms and develops, and we characterise
the network by several other time-varying quantities:
the mean degree, the clustering coefficient, the
average path length, and the degree distribution. We
find that the first three statistics increase over time
in the growing network; the degree distribution tends
to stabilise toward an exponentially truncated
power-law. We finally suggest an effective network
interpretation that takes into account the aging of
collaboration relationships.},
added-at = {2008-06-19T17:46:40.000+0200},
author = {Tomassini, Marco and Luthi, Leslie},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23f82a5e0a4ff36dbcfe5a87cc7adf5ef/brazovayeye},
interhash = {f41fbf86c516eb85dd03d62402805f5a},
intrahash = {3f82a5e0a4ff36dbcfe5a87cc7adf5ef},
journal = {Physica A},
keywords = {Network Preferential Scientific Social algorithms, attachment, collaboration, evolution, genetic networks programming,},
note = {Available online 25 July 2007},
pages = {750--764},
size = {15 pages},
timestamp = {2008-06-19T17:53:14.000+0200},
title = {Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific
collaboration network},
volume = 385,
year = 2007
}