We present a comprehensive survey of robot Learning
from Demonstration (LfD), a technique that develops
policies from example state to action mappings. We
introduce the LfD design choices in terms of
demonstrator, problem space, policy derivation and
performance, and contribute the foundations for a
structure in which to categorize LfD research.
Specifically, we analyze and categorize the multiple
ways in which examples are gathered, ranging from
teleoperation to imitation, as well as the various
techniques for policy derivation, including matching
functions, dynamics models and plans. To conclude we
discuss LfD limitations and related promising areas for
future research.
%0 Journal Article
%1 argall-survey-robot-learning-2009
%A Argall, Brenna D.
%A Chernova, Sonia
%A Veloso, Manuela
%A Browning, Brett
%D 2009
%J Robotics and Autonomous Systems
%K robotics survey
%N 5
%P 469--483
%R http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024
%T A survey of robot learning from demonstration
%U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889008001772
%V 57
%X We present a comprehensive survey of robot Learning
from Demonstration (LfD), a technique that develops
policies from example state to action mappings. We
introduce the LfD design choices in terms of
demonstrator, problem space, policy derivation and
performance, and contribute the foundations for a
structure in which to categorize LfD research.
Specifically, we analyze and categorize the multiple
ways in which examples are gathered, ranging from
teleoperation to imitation, as well as the various
techniques for policy derivation, including matching
functions, dynamics models and plans. To conclude we
discuss LfD limitations and related promising areas for
future research.
@article{argall-survey-robot-learning-2009,
abstract = {We present a comprehensive survey of robot Learning
from Demonstration (LfD), a technique that develops
policies from example state to action mappings. We
introduce the LfD design choices in terms of
demonstrator, problem space, policy derivation and
performance, and contribute the foundations for a
structure in which to categorize LfD research.
Specifically, we analyze and categorize the multiple
ways in which examples are gathered, ranging from
teleoperation to imitation, as well as the various
techniques for policy derivation, including matching
functions, dynamics models and plans. To conclude we
discuss LfD limitations and related promising areas for
future research.},
added-at = {2016-07-12T19:24:18.000+0200},
author = {Argall, Brenna D. and Chernova, Sonia and Veloso, Manuela and Browning, Brett},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2414204b9b3207c9f681f447bcafd3d91/mhwombat},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024},
interhash = {49f23c77985b9355833683d3ae52faab},
intrahash = {414204b9b3207c9f681f447bcafd3d91},
issn = {0921-8890},
journal = {Robotics and Autonomous Systems},
keywords = {robotics survey},
number = 5,
pages = {469--483},
timestamp = {2016-07-12T19:25:30.000+0200},
title = {A survey of robot learning from demonstration},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889008001772},
volume = 57,
year = 2009
}