%0 Journal Article %1 anand_09_symbolic %A Anand, Saswat %A Puasuareanu, Corina %A Visser, Willem %D 2009 %J International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT) %K 2009 symbolic_execution abstraction %N 1 %P 53--67 %R http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-008-0090-1 %T Symbolic execution with abstraction %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-008-0090-1 %V 11 %X Abstract  We address the problem of error detection for programs that take recursive data structures and arrays as input. Previously we proposed a combination of symbolic execution and model checking for the analysis of such programs: we put a bound on the size of the program inputs and/or the search depth of the model checker to limit the search state space. Here we look beyond bounded model checking and consider state matching techniques to limit the state space. We describe a method for examining whether a symbolic state that arises during symbolic execution is subsumed by another symbolic state. Since the number of symbolic states may be infinite, subsumption is not enough to ensure termination. Therefore, we also consider abstraction techniques for computing and storing abstract states during symbolic execution. Subsumption checking determines whether an abstract state is being revisited, in which case the model checker backtracks—this enables analysis of an under-approximation of the program behaviors. We illustrate the technique with abstractions for lists and arrays. We also discuss abstractions for more general data structures. The abstractions encode both the shape of the program heap and the constraints on numeric data. We have implemented the techniques in the Java PathFinder tool and we show their effectiveness on Java programs. This paper is an extended version of Anand et al. (Proceedings of SPIN, pp. 163–181, 2006).

@article{anand_09_symbolic, abstract = {Abstract  We address the problem of error detection for programs that take recursive data structures and arrays as input. Previously we proposed a combination of symbolic execution and model checking for the analysis of such programs: we put a bound on the size of the program inputs and/or the search depth of the model checker to limit the search state space. Here we look beyond bounded model checking and consider state matching techniques to limit the state space. We describe a method for examining whether a symbolic state that arises during symbolic execution is subsumed by another symbolic state. Since the number of symbolic states may be infinite, subsumption is not enough to ensure termination. Therefore, we also consider abstraction techniques for computing and storing abstract states during symbolic execution. Subsumption checking determines whether an abstract state is being revisited, in which case the model checker backtracks—this enables analysis of an under-approximation of the program behaviors. We illustrate the technique with abstractions for lists and arrays. We also discuss abstractions for more general data structures. The abstractions encode both the shape of the program heap and the constraints on numeric data. We have implemented the techniques in the Java PathFinder tool and we show their effectiveness on Java programs. This paper is an extended version of Anand et al. (Proceedings of SPIN, pp. 163–181, 2006).}, added-at = {2009-02-11T20:09:09.000+0100}, author = {Anand, Saswat and Pu{a}su{a}reanu, Corina and Visser, Willem}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22d86efa158d65aa7d55073e12a063ac4/leonardo}, citeulike-article-id = {3785827}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-008-0090-1}, interhash = {24b7cec25fdf4fdca4a68ce8f3932824}, intrahash = {2d86efa158d65aa7d55073e12a063ac4}, journal = {International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT)}, keywords = {2009 symbolic_execution abstraction}, month = {February}, number = 1, pages = {53--67}, posted-at = {2009-01-15 13:07:05}, priority = {2}, timestamp = {2009-02-11T20:09:09.000+0100}, title = {Symbolic execution with abstraction}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-008-0090-1}, volume = 11, year = 2009 }