This article asks two related questions: Is digital media studies a discipline, and should scholars within the field desire to move toward disciplinarity? Drawing on the writings of Michel Foucualt and Pierre Bourdieu, as well as several Anglo-American cultural studies of disciplinarity, the essay argues that digital media studies has not yet constituted a truly novel scholarly discourse. Because of that, our reasons for disciplinizing?to the extent that it is possible to choose to become a discipline?would be largely strategic. Given that the field is already successfully reproducing itself, the symbolic benefits of becoming a discipline are relatively limited, and such a move would also have significant intellectual costs.
%0 Journal Article
%1 sterne_digital_2005
%A Sterne, Jonathan
%D 2005
%J The Information Society
%K digital disciplinarity institutional internalist internet technology
%N 4
%P 249--256
%R 10.1080/01972240591007562
%T Digital Media and Disciplinarity
%V 21
%X This article asks two related questions: Is digital media studies a discipline, and should scholars within the field desire to move toward disciplinarity? Drawing on the writings of Michel Foucualt and Pierre Bourdieu, as well as several Anglo-American cultural studies of disciplinarity, the essay argues that digital media studies has not yet constituted a truly novel scholarly discourse. Because of that, our reasons for disciplinizing?to the extent that it is possible to choose to become a discipline?would be largely strategic. Given that the field is already successfully reproducing itself, the symbolic benefits of becoming a discipline are relatively limited, and such a move would also have significant intellectual costs.
@article{sterne_digital_2005,
abstract = {This article asks two related questions: Is digital media studies a discipline, and should scholars within the field desire to move toward disciplinarity? Drawing on the writings of Michel Foucualt and Pierre Bourdieu, as well as several Anglo-American cultural studies of disciplinarity, the essay argues that digital media studies has not yet constituted a truly novel scholarly discourse. Because of that, our reasons for disciplinizing?to the extent that it is possible to choose to become a discipline?would be largely strategic. Given that the field is already successfully reproducing itself, the symbolic benefits of becoming a discipline are relatively limited, and such a move would also have significant intellectual costs.},
added-at = {2019-08-29T01:56:31.000+0200},
author = {Sterne, Jonathan},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24dc074675dc107f9f97a748c5db4daba/jpooley},
doi = {10.1080/01972240591007562},
interhash = {a757642c072052737b058971669e8575},
intrahash = {4dc074675dc107f9f97a748c5db4daba},
journal = {The Information Society},
keywords = {digital disciplinarity institutional internalist internet technology},
month = sep,
number = 4,
pages = {249--256},
timestamp = {2019-08-29T01:56:31.000+0200},
title = {Digital {{Media}} and {{Disciplinarity}}},
volume = 21,
year = 2005
}