Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter
D. Boyd, S. Golder, and G. Lotan. Proceedings of the 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, page 1--10. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, (2010)
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2010.412
Abstract
Twitter - a microblogging service that enables users to post messages ("tweets") of up to 140 characters - supports a variety of communicative practices; participants use Twitter to converse with individuals, groups, and the public at large, so when conversations emerge, they are often experienced by broader audiences than just the interlocutors. This paper examines the practice of retweeting as a way by which participants can be "in a conversation." While retweeting has become a convention inside Twitter, participants retweet using different styles and for diverse reasons. We highlight how authorship, attribution, and communicative fidelity are negotiated in diverse ways. Using a series of case studies and empirical data, this paper maps out retweeting as a conversational practice.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 citeulike:12313592
%A Boyd, Danah
%A Golder, Scott
%A Lotan, Gilad
%B Proceedings of the 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
%C Washington, DC, USA
%D 2010
%I IEEE Computer Society
%K twitter
%P 1--10
%R 10.1109/hicss.2010.412
%T Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2010.412
%X Twitter - a microblogging service that enables users to post messages ("tweets") of up to 140 characters - supports a variety of communicative practices; participants use Twitter to converse with individuals, groups, and the public at large, so when conversations emerge, they are often experienced by broader audiences than just the interlocutors. This paper examines the practice of retweeting as a way by which participants can be "in a conversation." While retweeting has become a convention inside Twitter, participants retweet using different styles and for diverse reasons. We highlight how authorship, attribution, and communicative fidelity are negotiated in diverse ways. Using a series of case studies and empirical data, this paper maps out retweeting as a conversational practice.
%@ 978-0-7695-3869-3
@inproceedings{citeulike:12313592,
abstract = {{Twitter - a microblogging service that enables users to post messages ("tweets") of up to 140 characters - supports a variety of communicative practices; participants use Twitter to converse with individuals, groups, and the public at large, so when conversations emerge, they are often experienced by broader audiences than just the interlocutors. This paper examines the practice of retweeting as a way by which participants can be "in a conversation." While retweeting has become a convention inside Twitter, participants retweet using different styles and for diverse reasons. We highlight how authorship, attribution, and communicative fidelity are negotiated in diverse ways. Using a series of case studies and empirical data, this paper maps out retweeting as a conversational practice.}},
added-at = {2018-03-19T12:24:51.000+0100},
address = {Washington, DC, USA},
author = {Boyd, Danah and Golder, Scott and Lotan, Gilad},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25d6f91f4f088711df64cf90de4687e26/aho},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences},
citeulike-article-id = {12313592},
citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1748152},
citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2010.412},
comment = {Why people retweet?},
doi = {10.1109/hicss.2010.412},
interhash = {687c3cf63bf9840da619520d37a3aec1},
intrahash = {5d6f91f4f088711df64cf90de4687e26},
isbn = {978-0-7695-3869-3},
keywords = {twitter},
pages = {1--10},
posted-at = {2013-05-01 08:32:53},
priority = {2},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
series = {HICSS '10},
timestamp = {2018-03-19T12:24:51.000+0100},
title = {{Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2010.412},
year = 2010
}