%0 Journal Article %1 vanluijn2007era %A Luijn, HEM Van %A Musschenga, AW %A Keus, RB %A Aaronson, NK %D 2007 %J IRB: Ethics and Human Research %K checklist-paper neuroethicsnet %N 1 %P 13-18 %T Evaluating the risks and benefits of Phase II and III cancer clinical trials: A look at Institutional Review Boards in the Netherlands %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17855839 %V 29 %X This study examined the opinions of Dutch institutional review board members about the assessment of the risk-benefit ratio in phase II and phase III clinical cancer trials. We conducted interviews with 53 members of IRBs from four academic hospitals and two specialized cancer centers in the Netherlands. Lack of evaluation criteria, uncertainty concerning the benefits to patients, and insufficient information about the study rationale were mentioned frequently as difficult aspects when assessing the risk-benefit ratio in phase II and III cancer protocols. More than half of the IRB members expressed interest in obtaining more information and education to make these assessments. Many also believed that better insight into patients’ perspectives could aid them. However, only a minority favor actually including patients on IRBs.

@article{vanluijn2007era, abstract = {This study examined the opinions of Dutch institutional review board members about the assessment of the risk-benefit ratio in phase II and phase III clinical cancer trials. We conducted interviews with 53 members of IRBs from four academic hospitals and two specialized cancer centers in the Netherlands. Lack of evaluation criteria, uncertainty concerning the benefits to patients, and insufficient information about the study rationale were mentioned frequently as difficult aspects when assessing the risk-benefit ratio in phase II and III cancer protocols. More than half of the IRB members expressed interest in obtaining more information and education to make these assessments. Many also believed that better insight into patients’ perspectives could aid them. However, only a minority favor actually including patients on IRBs.}, added-at = {2009-05-05T19:03:40.000+0200}, author = {Luijn, HEM Van and Musschenga, AW and Keus, RB and Aaronson, NK}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26be8171b570a17a59f3c257d9490c4c1/toby}, interhash = {2d23563d6cd2048b706d6eb11e0d6ad9}, intrahash = {6be8171b570a17a59f3c257d9490c4c1}, journal = {IRB: Ethics and Human Research}, keywords = {checklist-paper neuroethicsnet}, month = {Jan-Feb}, number = 1, pages = {13-18}, timestamp = {2009-05-05T19:03:41.000+0200}, title = {{Evaluating the risks and benefits of Phase II and III cancer clinical trials: A look at Institutional Review Boards in the Netherlands}}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17855839}, volume = 29, year = 2007 }