%0 Journal Article %1 couvillon2015variation %A Couvillon, Margaret J. %A Walter, Chandra M. %A Blows, Eluned M. %A Czaczkes, Tomer J. %A Alton, Karin L. %A Ratnieks, Francis L. W. %D 2015 %J Psyche %K bees flower insect referencing variation %P 7 %T Busy Bees: Variation in Insect Flower-Visiting Rates across Multiple Plant Species %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/134630 %V 2015 %X We quantified insect visitation rates by counting how many flowers/inflorescences were probed per unit time for five plant species (four native and one garden: California lilac, bramble, ragwort, wild marjoram, and ivy) growing in Sussex, United Kingdom, by following individual insects () from nine functional groups (honey bees (Apis mellifera), bumble bees (Bombus spp.), hoverflies, flies, butterflies, beetles, wasps, non-Apidae bees, and moths). Additionally, we made a census of the insect diversity on the studied plant species. Overall we found that insect groups differed greatly in their rate of flower visits (), with bumble bees and honey bees visiting significantly more flowers per time (11.5 and 9.2 flowers/minute, resp.) than the other insect groups. Additionally, we report on a within-group difference in the non-Apidae bees, where the genus Osmia, which is often suggested as an alternative to honey bees as a managed pollinator, was very speedy (13.4 flowers/minute) compared to the other non-Apidae bees (4.3 flowers/minute). Our census showed that the plants attracted a range of insects, with the honey bee as the most abundant visitor (34%). Therefore, rate differences cannot be explained by particular specializations. Lastly, we discuss potential implications of our conclusions for pollination.

@article{couvillon2015variation, abstract = {We quantified insect visitation rates by counting how many flowers/inflorescences were probed per unit time for five plant species (four native and one garden: California lilac, bramble, ragwort, wild marjoram, and ivy) growing in Sussex, United Kingdom, by following individual insects () from nine functional groups (honey bees (Apis mellifera), bumble bees (Bombus spp.), hoverflies, flies, butterflies, beetles, wasps, non-Apidae bees, and moths). Additionally, we made a census of the insect diversity on the studied plant species. Overall we found that insect groups differed greatly in their rate of flower visits (), with bumble bees and honey bees visiting significantly more flowers per time (11.5 and 9.2 flowers/minute, resp.) than the other insect groups. Additionally, we report on a within-group difference in the non-Apidae bees, where the genus Osmia, which is often suggested as an alternative to honey bees as a managed pollinator, was very speedy (13.4 flowers/minute) compared to the other non-Apidae bees (4.3 flowers/minute). Our census showed that the plants attracted a range of insects, with the honey bee as the most abundant visitor (34%). Therefore, rate differences cannot be explained by particular specializations. Lastly, we discuss potential implications of our conclusions for pollination.}, added-at = {2018-05-23T23:20:11.000+0200}, author = {Couvillon, Margaret J. and Walter, Chandra M. and Blows, Eluned M. and Czaczkes, Tomer J. and Alton, Karin L. and Ratnieks, Francis L. W.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/272d45691168a7b608516a08e7523d231/lrlabuschagne}, description = {Busy Bees: Variation in Insect Flower-Visiting Rates across Multiple Plant Species}, interhash = {f3e4ea096e508627bc7ff0297eaf3e1e}, intrahash = {72d45691168a7b608516a08e7523d231}, journal = {Psyche}, keywords = {bees flower insect referencing variation}, pages = 7, timestamp = {2018-05-23T23:20:11.000+0200}, title = {Busy Bees: Variation in Insect Flower-Visiting Rates across Multiple Plant Species}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/134630}, volume = 2015, year = 2015 }