%0 Generic %1 citeulike:363723 %A Kofler, Johannes %A Paterek, Tomasz %A Brukner, Caslav %D 2005 %K bell freedom quantum %T Experimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography %U http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0510167 %X Bell's theorem states that no local realistic explanation of quantum mechanical predictions is possible, in which the experimenter has a freedom to choose between different measurement settings. Within a local realistic picture the violation of Bell's inequalities can only be understood if this freedom is denied. We determine the minimal degree to which the experimenter's freedom has to be abandoned, if one wants to keep such a picture and be in agreement with the experiment. Furthermore, the freedom in choosing experimental arrangements may be considered as a resource, since its lacking can be used by an eavesdropper to harm the security of quantum communication. We analyze the security of quantum key distribution as a function of the (partial) knowledge the eavesdropper has about the future choices of measurement settings which are made by the authorized parties (e.g. on the basis of some quasi-random generator). We show that the equivalence between the violation of Bell's inequality and the efficient extraction of a secure key - which exists for the case of complete freedom (no setting knowledge) - is lost unless one adapts the bound of the inequality according to this lack of freedom.

@misc{citeulike:363723, abstract = {Bell's theorem states that no local realistic explanation of quantum mechanical predictions is possible, in which the experimenter has a freedom to choose between different measurement settings. Within a local realistic picture the violation of Bell's inequalities can only be understood if this freedom is denied. We determine the minimal degree to which the experimenter's freedom has to be abandoned, if one wants to keep such a picture and be in agreement with the experiment. Furthermore, the freedom in choosing experimental arrangements may be considered as a resource, since its lacking can be used by an eavesdropper to harm the security of quantum communication. We analyze the security of quantum key distribution as a function of the (partial) knowledge the eavesdropper has about the future choices of measurement settings which are made by the authorized parties (e.g. on the basis of some quasi-random generator). We show that the equivalence between the violation of Bell's inequality and the efficient extraction of a secure key - which exists for the case of complete freedom (no setting knowledge) - is lost unless one adapts the bound of the inequality according to this lack of freedom.}, added-at = {2007-08-18T13:22:24.000+0200}, author = {Kofler, Johannes and Paterek, Tomasz and Brukner, Caslav}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2787389a532f0e371721520acc395d1bf/a_olympia}, citeulike-article-id = {363723}, description = {citeulike}, eprint = {quant-ph/0510167}, interhash = {9e3a634ea0b5e07ade40fe7256d17f44}, intrahash = {787389a532f0e371721520acc395d1bf}, keywords = {bell freedom quantum}, month = Oct, priority = {2}, timestamp = {2007-08-18T13:22:43.000+0200}, title = {Experimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0510167}, year = 2005 }