Crowdsourced quality-of-experience (QoE) assessments are more costeffective
and flexible than traditional in-lab evaluations but require
careful test design, innovative incentive mechanisms, and technical
expertise to address various implementation challenges.
%0 Journal Article
%1 info3-article-2014-129
%A Hoßfeld, Tobias
%A Keimel, Christian
%A Timmerer, Christian
%D 2014
%J IEEE Computer
%K myown
%P 98-102
%T Crowdsourcing Quality-of-Experience Assessments
%V 47
%X Crowdsourced quality-of-experience (QoE) assessments are more costeffective
and flexible than traditional in-lab evaluations but require
careful test design, innovative incentive mechanisms, and technical
expertise to address various implementation challenges.
@article{info3-article-2014-129,
abstract = {Crowdsourced quality-of-experience (QoE) assessments are more costeffective
and flexible than traditional in-lab evaluations but require
careful test design, innovative incentive mechanisms, and technical
expertise to address various implementation challenges.},
added-at = {2016-03-10T17:33:03.000+0100},
author = {Hoßfeld, Tobias and Keimel, Christian and Timmerer, Christian},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/278b3662e15fe6da2c0512b49a2e00dfc/uniwue_info3},
interhash = {d192d59de16f3a1ed841409fc0abc7b7},
intrahash = {78b3662e15fe6da2c0512b49a2e00dfc},
journal = {IEEE Computer},
keywords = {myown},
month = {9},
pages = {98-102},
timestamp = {2022-03-14T00:09:17.000+0100},
title = {Crowdsourcing Quality-of-Experience Assessments},
volume = 47,
year = 2014
}