Academic research often claims to investigate phenomena, but we conventionally insist that such investigations take place with the consent of those being studied. In this blue sky paper, we suggest that information science researchers should consider the contexts in which it might be beneficial to violate this norm and pursue what we describe as antago-nistic investigation. In relation to illegal and socially harmful activities such as platform manipulation, fraud and the spread of propaganda, we argue that researchers should go against the wishes of those they're studying and possibly, in the process, violate privacy norms, challenge illegal activities and call for accountability as a result of research. While these investigative activities are not conventional in information science research, they draw on core strengths of the field and position researchers to produce impactful work on relevant and pressing topics.
%0 Journal Article
%1 carter_little_2019
%A Carter, Daniel
%A Sholler, Dan
%A Acker, Amelia
%D 2019
%K informationswissenschaft
%T A little antagonism might be nice : investigation in information science
%U https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/103135
%X Academic research often claims to investigate phenomena, but we conventionally insist that such investigations take place with the consent of those being studied. In this blue sky paper, we suggest that information science researchers should consider the contexts in which it might be beneficial to violate this norm and pursue what we describe as antago-nistic investigation. In relation to illegal and socially harmful activities such as platform manipulation, fraud and the spread of propaganda, we argue that researchers should go against the wishes of those they're studying and possibly, in the process, violate privacy norms, challenge illegal activities and call for accountability as a result of research. While these investigative activities are not conventional in information science research, they draw on core strengths of the field and position researchers to produce impactful work on relevant and pressing topics.
@article{carter_little_2019,
abstract = {Academic research often claims to investigate phenomena, but we conventionally insist that such investigations take place with the consent of those being studied. In this blue sky paper, we suggest that information science researchers should consider the contexts in which it might be beneficial to violate this norm and pursue what we describe as antago-nistic investigation. In relation to illegal and socially harmful activities such as platform manipulation, fraud and the spread of propaganda, we argue that researchers should go against the wishes of those they're studying and possibly, in the process, violate privacy norms, challenge illegal activities and call for accountability as a result of research. While these investigative activities are not conventional in information science research, they draw on core strengths of the field and position researchers to produce impactful work on relevant and pressing topics.},
added-at = {2019-04-01T13:15:32.000+0200},
author = {Carter, Daniel and Sholler, Dan and Acker, Amelia},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27c3e83c14b32c682f6660fc5869b7d08/lepsky},
copyright = {Copyright 2019 Daniel Carter, Dan Sholler, and Amelia Acker},
interhash = {81317a8e60921ff6cd2487dff83d0818},
intrahash = {7c3e83c14b32c682f6660fc5869b7d08},
keywords = {informationswissenschaft},
language = {en},
month = mar,
shorttitle = {A little antagonism might be nice},
timestamp = {2019-04-01T13:15:32.000+0200},
title = {A little antagonism might be nice : investigation in information science},
url = {https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/103135},
urldate = {2019-03-15},
year = 2019
}